Originally
posted by
ebola:
Obviously breakers mean a lot especially at the beginning, but if in 4 weeks time SoL has 75+ countries left and LaF has 55 (of which 5 are unbreakable), then I would probably prefer to be on SoLs side.
LaFs problem has usually been restart rate and keeping up activity over a long time. Their FSs/first week are usually good given their initial numbers and NW (see e.g. last reset).
Either way, didn't SoL say they weren't going to hit LaF? :)
I've been involved with war's with them both for years against and on the same side, personally I'm a maki fan never met or talked directly to the man but know and admire his stance from a warfare perspective, he's helped orchestrate some huge wars that our modern players in this game wouldn't even dream of eg (RAGE ARROW SOL UCN Wars)SoL and LaF have earn't there place in history of this game. LaF atm are sound they're well rounded no real flaw their active and have the numbers, SoL's just got their numbers back hopefully not for just this set but for sets to come, with those numbers come some very experienced players thar know how to brawl it with the best.
This game is political, with politics come lies and descent, and greater wealthier for your own people, if SoL said they won't attack LaF and you take that as how you see it your new to this game, if it's in the greater interest or one of those heads hold a grudge from previous set's they'll clash alright! it's repeated itself over and over in this game that's what makes it so beautiful!