looks like you played in LaF from around april to july 2006. here are some sample posts you did on our site:

Alin
4/5/2006 2:44:10 AM
bah sorry for posting this on the wrong board!

Alin**
5/29/2006 9:04:45 AM
so for all the Fa i sent i recive 0 points ... cool

Alin**
5/31/2006 7:27:49 AM
lol ... funny! You have to find like 4-5 warforums -> one forum to Fa ... another one to post the Fa ... another one to find targets ... one forum for readiness ... could we have like A FORUM FOR EVERY THREAD ?

Alin
4/25/2006 7:29:19 PM
broke him down from 450k BR ... if anyone wanna folow

Alin**
7/2/2006 7:10:50 AM
bah ... outrage

Alin
4/5/2006 2:43:32 AM
(#924) - going to play Theo Techer!




looks like you played theo techer that reset, but we had a war and you put your number on our phone lists? unless you are telling me someone went by Alin and used your number to post on our phone list that reset, it had to be most definitely you.

any more questions?

facts dont matter with dagga. 20 months sounds cooler than 10 months!

Panzer (#924) (LaF1) was your country.

i didn't know that was considered "SOL or Arrow"

i looked at our history archives to help you refresh your memory Alin.

http://wiki.earthempires.com/index.php/Axis

that reset was a world war reset known as World War XI.

LaF was FDPed to both IX and SOL. You played in LaF that reset while we collectively fought the anti-coalition forces led by Elysium, RAGE, MD and SoF.

ring a bell now?


you put your number on our phone list. you want me to show you more posts you wrote on our site during that time? i can't believe you have such bad memory heh

Alin: you got SMSed because our recruiter messaged some guys from old LaF phone lists.

anyways for your own privacy i blanked out your number but from old LaF's forums

Alin
4/20/2006 11:50:31 AM
(#924) - Panzer

+04 xxxxxxxxx ( East Europe ) - > Romania! Call Anytime





you obviously played in LaF in 2006 and left your number on our phone lists, so why are you playing stupid now? you are right, our guy should've made the connection that you are playing in SOL now and not have SMSed you, but regardless for someone who played in "ARROW/SOL only" can you explain why you left your number on our site? :P

dagga: if you put 1/100th the effort trolling AT into walling you would still be alive still ;P

how do you get gangbanged by an alliance who didn't hit you (SoF) and the same alliance twice (MD)?

you still avoided answering why you tried to "shove" such pact in the first place to LaF

there's nothing wrong about planning for the future

we all do that.

there's something inherently wrong about signing a pact with the intentions of breaking it. that's how you guys designed it.

its also extremely hypocritical to cry foul when it used the way you designed it. if you don't like it, then why design it that way?

two resets ago, i wanted to reach a long term peace deal with you.

we signed it with good faith.

you didn't.

you guys never once said that was a problem and admitted, but instead of focused on other things (like how the logs were obtained, etc.).

you can protect your alliance. that was the whole point of the original peace deal. if you were LaF, how would you feel if you signed a 3 reset peace deal with SOL with good intentions but find out later the other side is signing it with bad intentions before the ink is dry?

how would you like if LaF signs a pact while on the side plotting with another alliance on how to fluff SOL up with that "peace" pact at the same time to "surprise" SOL.

never once did you guys try to address this problem. you just hoped we all forgot about it and everything was peachy.

how was the reason changed? :P


1) SOL was looking for a war
you saying this changed in the last 24 hours?

2) We were personally told by SOL our pact was already void due to both LaF hitting MD (a SOL FDP) and SOL hitting LCN (a LaF FDP).
you saying this changed in the last 24 hours?

3) Given SOL's size and talented war skills due to ally obligations we cannot let them pick on our allies
you saying this changed in the last 24 hours?

4) LaF declares war on SOL
you saying this changed in the last 24 hours?



still playing stupid? any more dumb and the webster should have this entry

dagga n. a extremely severe case of mental retardation

so as usual Makinso, your only answer to the plotting was how it is a crime to use google and to crawl mediafire. :P

still the same "let's avoid the problem at hand"

SOL and LaF fought over that?

more like you never explained why, so we are warring over it now ;)

and stop playing stupid, i even showed you guys the google search.

searching for makinso on google brought you to logs. just because it is not on mediafire anymore you are claiming stupid now?

ill-gotten means my ass. i didn't know using google was considered wrong :P if so, then i "ill gotten" information everyday :P

you should makinso why he wrote those terms in the first place.

i didn't know it said only SOL -> can <- use the pacts but we can't. if you wanted it to be that one sided, then write it that way ;P but i doubt we'd accept it ;)

he already said it a few times, but he just bothered sharing with you all.

he thought it was cute to surprise the rest of us ;)

he also thought he can avoid answering any questions last reset and hope it goes away, but he decides to bring it up again this reset, so i'm all ears ;P

makinso has some memory loss apparently:

<Makinso> I can put in a 55 - 60 member SOL
<Makinso> most likely
<@Arsenal> To my next point
<BattleKJ> Do you care about a 'fair' 1v1 with LaF or do you just want to kill them?
<Makinso> lol
<Makinso> I think the point is kill
<@Arsenal> We need a strong sense of LaF's current pacts and any long term pacts
<@Arsenal> To that end we need to quietly go about finding out their pacting situation with our allies
<@Arsenal> and Compile a list
<@Arsenal> MD will fight fair unless FS'd, in which case we may call in the political power.<Makinso> knowing hanlong
<Makinso> he'll try to end it quick
<BattleKJ> are you going to try pact up LCN?
<@Arsenal> Hanlong is so politically fluffed he has no idea.
<Makinso> if we have the oppurtunity to neutralize LCN
<Makinso> we should<@Arsenal> Yes I might KJ, I think LCN would jump at taking a uNAP right now.
<Makinso> they would pact us as well I believe
<Makinso> knowing we have a 3 set deal with LaF
<Makinso> :P
<BattleKJ> im fairly sure they would have pacted sol this set if you asked them
<BattleKJ> as evo kept on telling them to
<Makinso> I think we pacted







<Makinso> Honestly
<Makinso> anyone wanting a deal out of this
<Makinso> you should give
<BattleKJ> rival hit sol last set, and rejected our pact this set
<@Arsenal> Yea
<Makinso> the more you're able
<Makinso> to single out LaF
<@Arsenal> I'm not saying don't hit them
<Makinso> the better



you were saying that sham of a pact you signed with us 2 resets ago was actually valid? lol



plus to confirm how this pact was already void, SOL said this specifically to us:

"As our current pact can be voided by either side since we engaged in conflict with known FDPs already, the current pact can be broken by either side (if they desired so)"

plus you were the one that wanted to "shove this down our throat"


<Makinso> - This pact has a voidable clause for boths parties FDPs. FDPs are to be listed at the start of the set, or this pact. The uNAP can be voided if one of the parties of this pact is involved in a war with one of the other parties FDPs.
<Makinso> I'm looking to shuv this down his throat
<ArsenalMD> ya
<ArsenalMD> who do u have LT's with?
<Makinso> none yet
<ArsenalMD> lol good
<Makinso> im tryin to convince Hanlong to take the pact
<ArsenalMD> ok
<ArsenalMD> that looks good to me
<ArsenalMD> :-p
<ArsenalMD> gives us flex
<Makinso> I think I did it




remember? :P instead of shoving pacts down people's throats in ways to circumvent it with lame void clauses, don't cry when we use your formula against you....

if you think it's lame, don't shove it down other people's throats then. you were the one that wrote these terms, and you were the one that wanted to use it against us. am i not correct?

im sure both martian and pang would love to get drunk :P

do we have to bring up the logs again on why you guys made us sign this "offensive" pact clause in the first place?

you guys must have short term memory loss or something

so it was only ok for SOL to use it to attack but not vice versa? you guys never answered to us why you guys wanted that pact in the first place and explained the logs to us or anyone else on AT.

what exactly is he sucking? :P

haha my dog's name isn't actually SoF

but i do have a maltese/poodle

sometimes she's smart, but sometimes she does the dumbest fluff

It was already voided last reset. You guys agreed to this already.

details at 11

Jiman: you call 2 resets when we agreed to pact SOL but Makinso decided to get cute being a "nice guy"?

Or the fact that you were about to FS LaF last reset during our 1v1 war with MD (that you helped set up?) Was that nice guy too?

The only reason why you decided to honor your prearranged war was because you realized it was a lost cause, but you actually were considering it.

I asked you last reset to change our pact into a real one since the one you guys made me sign 2 resets ago was a sham.

You refused to answer me last reset. Remember that Jiman?

dagga:

Remember when we hit SOL the first time and you said "4 resets no netgaining?"

We're at war 4 since then ;) I can't let you guys lie, you know!

anyways im out,

please post more theories dagga so we can look back and laugh at you later :P

Department of Defense

we learned it from the best ;) you should be flattered

LOL

please tell yourself that ;)

OMG SOV

Y U SO SERIOUS

i have a maltese poodle. i call her SoF

i'm just a dog, your question is too hard :(

chevs hasn't trained me to answer such questions yet

dumb questions get dumb humor

i'm sorry chevs!

you forgot to give me my rabies shot that's why!

don't ask me i'm just a lapdog!

*WOOF*

chevs didnt give me my damned doggie biscuit yet

i can't believe you are being serious dagga :P

*woof*

that's pretty funny considering we told them our FS time and all our plans like a good lapdog does :P

Chevs told me to jump

I asked him how high

But then he told me to sit

But I rolled over instead.

Chevs didn't give me my doggie biscuit :(

Sov: *woof*

junky: i would've take pictures of my man tits with "LaF declare war on SOL" to post on AT, but i don't think you would want to see that :P

my fluff country finished higher in nw than all ur countries combined ;)