I was thinking it was likely one of his multis trying to get an excuse for a humiliating defeat :P But I guess when everyone and their mother hates you, you shouldn't post your country name on the forums.

Btw, a 300k networth country that didn't seem to have full turns ruined your set? Imagine if he had saved full turns and switched governments....

Exactly what a tag that was gonna blindside someone would say! :P

Kidding, good luck

To be fair, only hulls of ships that are central to the plot can withstand lasers and photon torpedos, so basically, never go warp 10 without a main character on board.

Also, make sure you are not wearing a red shirt when doing so...

They made students be the crossing guards and those students were usually the ones getting beat up.

Teachers wouldn't get involved anyways. They're unionized.

Lmfao

This will be like watching Mike Tyson beat up on a cripple except the cripple would last longer in the ring than macdaddy will.

The sound of silence. He's trying to think of a way to weasel out of admitting to multying I'm sure... or he just wanted to brag about something to prove some obscure point and thought of the first thing that came to mind without stopping to think about whether it's true or not :P

Fact check: false.

IMP was never planning on having a successful netting set, the plan was to have a successful warring set. You didn't have a successful set warring or netting.

I'd take raz with inferior countries over you with a first strike any day of the week.

You're right, words only go so far. The actual facts as outlined by raz prove that you have not stepped up at all. I am not sure how you're so convinced you would have slaughtered him considering the evidence shows that you've never slaughtered anyone or even been able to hold your own against any competition. I'd consider yourself lucky that he didn't kill you, sing his praises, and call it a day lol

Epic

I'm just gonna leave this here. At least you cut your lies in half, that's a start.

The future is never clear, really. But if you want one thing that's clear... arguably the best war clan in EE-ffa history couldn't even carry you. You had a real chance to make an impact... you could have proven all that trash talk you've done to be justified. Instead, you flopped completely. In 10 days of war you got 3 kills... think about it.

I think a few of them are choking on it.

Who didn't?

As for suggestions, there's always been the messages in game but maybe there should be like a beginners guide in game with pop ups that explain what everything does... you remember the Microsoft Word paperclip? Something like that could be interesting.

I think hawk volunteered... :P

That is probably the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNqsgYMPzkQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYws8biwOYc

touché

Scott Tennerman Must Die.... omg best episode ever :P

https://www.youtube.com/...nue=208&v=U_eZmEiyTo0

Basically sums up this war.

hi mob

Lol macdaddy, for a guy that begs to be able to play this server in peace before every reset, you sure do make it hard on yourself for your next inevitable round of begging and grovelling.

http://www.earthempires.com/...eleted-43249?t=1496930441

I bet it's a pony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huTdk9kR-7Q

I thought donkeys were all the rage out there?

Whichever politician originally thought that idea up is brilliant, not intellectually brilliant but politically, "We're going to tax you for this and call it free". Hopefully it wasn't the same politician that was saying "The world is going to be full soon, better have less children to pay for your free health care" :P

Hard life for a smoker :(

Canadians don't have money bro, our government takes it all

It was not cheating, it was an ISP thing that happened to 2 tko, and 1 icd as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2QS-zTWDxo

Lol

An earthquake occurred destroying 87 buildings!

No wonder you always get deleted lol

Lol will he be deleted first or will he be killed off first? No one knows

1. Yep, I'm well aware of the numbers. Still not zero. Let me ask you, how many is enough? 1 million? 10 million? You realise half the world would love to come to a first world country and there are a lot of countries out there that are ACTUALLY admitting 0.
2. Yep. It is. Which is exactly why we don't need an agreement to continue doing what we're already doing. As I said, it is a heavily subsidised industry. In the agreement or not, the US government will continue to spend large swaths of money showing they care about reducing emissions, which is more than can be said for most of the countries in the agreement. Really, the entire Paris Climate thing is a non-sequitur as far as political impact on emissions goes. Which is exactly the reason not to be in it. It is a political move, not a move that actualizes anything in reality.
3. Yes. And? He was not some smoking gun. Even a lot of liberals admitted that the best takeaway from the whole thing is he thinks Trump is a liar, and I mean, if someone insulted me like Trump has insulted him, calling him a loon or whatever, of course I'd fight back. But as far as evidence? Nothing substantial whatsoever. Definitely nothing that constitutes obstruction of justice.
4. The French election is not "learning from our mistake". She was never going to be elected because of who her father is. The French don't care about you. And May would have dominated if not for her manifesto. Once that came out, she tanked in the polls. She was her own worst enemy, it had nothing to do with Trump. I suggest reading it to see how bad it is... it's like she was trying to lose.
https://www.conservatives.com/manifesto

You're not my mom

@Ivan
So the US should pay for the world's birth control because starving children? Not only is that not an argument, but I highly doubt you give a fluff about the world's starving children.

@Anti
1. I'll ignore the lie about letting in 0 refugees, but you did not address any arguments. You did not address the integration problem of refugees into western countries by saying it's "complex". How does letting someone into your country that cannot adopt your country's customs (ie, not raping women) and cannot succeed financially help them? Would more stable Middle Eastern countries with similar customs not be better for them? Nor did you explain how to properly vet people that are coming from places with few records that allow vetting possible. In fact, the only thing I can gather from your comment is you think there should be a travel ban on Saudi Arabia as well.
2. The financial data cited is not BS, actually. It is from an actual study. The argument that "other jobs will be created by signing into the agreement" is BS speculation. Not because it's not true that sure, jobs will be created no matter what we do, but those jobs are not guarantees and no one knows what the scope of those jobs could possibly be. But I did not refer to that data or anything Trump said. I'm trying to gather any arguments you made in this point but there's very little substance here. There are a lot of lies like saying China pollutes less than the US - not true and China is trending upwards. By the end of the agreement they'll be polluting 2 or 3 times more than the US. It's also safe to say that India will be polluting more while the US has been stable or reducing emissions for like 50 years and will continue to do so as the US green energy industry is HEAVILY subsidised. Things like every country but two signed the agreement - so? Not every country is actually doing anything in the agreement. I suggest you get familiar with what every country has pledged to do before arguing a moot point.
3. There is absolutely no evidence that would suggest that right now - not even close. I'll say this in caps in case your eyesight is bad: CONSPIRACY THEORIES ARE NOT ARGUMENTS.
4. Ok, seriously, now you're just rambling and did not address the point at all. I agree 100% the US should get out of the Middle East completely, though. I've been arguing this for years. Unfortunately, neoconservatives and neoliberals want to go in there and make more money or install democracy when no one in the Middle East wants democracy. They want Sharia Law. Let them have it. The fact that Trump left out article 5 means nothing. Actions speak louder than words and the fact that the previous administration completely ignored article 5 when Russia took Crimea is the only reason that discussion would be important in the modern day and age, which is all the more reason to have a strong NATO that meets its spending commitments outside the US. And yes, Iran was an ok place before US interference which is why I find it hilarious that the Democrats are upset that Russia might have tried to influence an election. The US has been dictating politics across the world for decades.

Anyways, you deal in a lot of conspiracy theories and insults and very little substance. I think you need to step back and look at whether or not your confirmation bias is getting the best of you. Acting like a US president has done nothing-at-all well is crazy, even Obama did some things well, even Bush did some things well, and so on. I don't think Trump is a wonderful president but he's not as awful as you think and if you think he's the devil, then the problem is probably with you.

1. Yes, I can mark all the terrorist ridden countries on maps. Not sure how geography is relevant here, but I'll throw it back at you: Have you BEEN to any of those countries? Do you think we should be accepting immigrants from Iran? Do you understand that we are currently bombing the heck out of places like Yemen and no country has ever bombed another country and taken their able bodied young men and given them refugee status at the same time? Do you understand that the vetting system is so broken that the US just gave a security clearance to someone named Reality Winner that wanted to burn the white house down and move to Kurdistan? Yet you expect them to vet people coming from places with few if any records. Add in the fact that when you are accepting refugees just to be nice these refugees often fail because they don't speak the language or understand the culture, so you're doing noone any good. Plus, I guess calling them terrorist ridden overlooks the fact that people from these countries go to every country that accepts them and commit crimes at an alarming rate. If you haven't served in those countries or visited them, then I don't understand you to know what crapholes they are but yeah, geography matters.
2. The Paris Climate Agreement means nothing. That's not me saying it, that's every Democrat saying it. The agreement is non-binding. Basically, it's virtue signalling. The dangerous part is that some will think it means something and it will suddenly become a political issue as it has now. Not being in the agreement does not mean the country still can't make green energy a priority, or help developing countries do the same, but essentially promising a large sum of money to a political union with no substantive power as to where that money goes is dangerous. It is better to be in control of your own money. Also, the fact that Obama wanted a huge amount of money to go towards it that is not representative to the US emissions and allows places like China, and India to pollute indefinitely is also a problem. The fact is that the agreement is just a PR tool for most countries. In fact, most countries signing it are essentially pledging absolutely nothing towards it so it is easy for them to criticise the US not getting in. Also, the agreement even if it was binding and even if it was fair is proposing to do essentially nothing. Considering what a complete disaster Kyoto was, I think there is good reason not to sign an agreement because "it's the only game in town", and Trump never said he wouldn't sign an agreement, just not that one. How is that not a fair statement? But yeah, "hilariously retarded", good point you numpty.
3. I was talking about Whitewater as for the investigation, not the impeachment that followed it; however, Bill Clinton should have been talking to a lawyer and likely was speaking to them even if they weren't speaking on his behalf. He was cleared not because he did not commit the offences he was impeached for but because of a partisan Senate, which is why if Trump were impeached (there is no evidence to suggest he has done anything impeachable yet) then he will get cleared by the Senate as well. There is no chance the Dems get a super majority and the Republicans have a long enough memory to realise that a lot of the Senators that refused to indict Bill Clinton are still sitting.
4. Having an armed NATO does not dethrone the US as a world leader. It is meant to prevent Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and possibly North Korean aggression across the pacific. Relying completely on the US to police the world is a bad idea especially when the US is riddled with major political issues. It would be much more beneficial if NATO could operate without the US to protect their sovereignty. As for the Middle East, there will be aggression there no matter what Europe does. There is already a major proxy war going on that might get a lot worse and having a strong NATO could make Saudi Arabia and Iran think twice about having a full scale war with each other. As far as the origin of the recent terrorist attacks in Europe, well, from all over actually. The Manchester attack was done by a guy with contacts in Libya. You can make any conspiracy theory as to the complicity of Saudi Arabia in the attacks, but acting like everything has one source is at best poorly thought out and at worst dangerously accusatory.

I agree the best way to make progress in the world is to be productive, not to burn stuff down, unfortunately, there are people like you that just say things without thinking them through. Be thankful there are people like me in the world, or everyone would be like you.

Few excellent deregulations
Travel ban for terrorist ridden countries will be good when it gets through the supreme court
Gorsuch
Allowed ICE to do their job
Given a long leash to a military that's needed it
Stopped paying for the third world's birth control
Ended the previous administrations war on policing
Repealed a few terrible Obama executive orders
Actually had a pretty good first foreign trip (re-established good relations with Israel, pressured NATO leaders to increase spending on their military... fyi, Canada is doubling their military spending in the coming years, I promise they added a few billion onto that because of Trump)
Got out of TPP negotiations... while I'm a free trade guy the TPP had a TON of problems
Got out of the Kyoto accord 2.0
Allowed a better mixture of media outlets into press briefings
This: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/...SEAL-died-Yemen-raid.html

And as far as PR stuff, there's been a lot of small things that would be lauded under Obama but were barely reported.

There are a lot of things to be critical of too. His executive orders are a mixed bag, his intervention in Syria was dangerous, he's been unable to unite the Republicans, his budget is a mixed bag, his health care deal is Obamacare lite, he's thrown Spicer under the bus a lot, Flynn should have never been hired, etc.

So far he's like a C+, probably where Bill Clinton was at this time in his presidency, not great with some allegations against him, but not disastrous. However, with the way idiot leftists are freaking out you'd think he was Stalin.