Jul 26th 2017, 13:32:51
You guys,
First of all, assumption is the mother of all fluff ups. That counts when making leadership decisions, admin decisions or whatever decision you attempt to make. Looking at this thread it's FULL OF assumptions. So guess what you guys are all breeding on?
I've lead succesful FFA tags with the brothers in it. (AoDT, CC and maybe he was even in Project DOOM can't remember)
I personally can not for 100% gaurantee that Donny/Billy is a legit duo playing or even were a legit duo when I lead. Why not? Because while i've seen and heard the duo playing. There's no 100% gaurantee that they are legit (as goes for any safelisting).
Besides that it is not MY or YOUR decision to delete / ban him. It's that of the mods and admins. And when it comes to having principals most people believe their judgement should be trusted (atleast from what I read)
Looking at how a 1a situation a few years back where RD hacked into GHQ and other clansites we gathered hard proof. Viable evidence tying different things together. There was no questioning, no gray area. It lead to bans, deletions and the FULL RD tag being deleted.
Looking at the current situation Donny and billy have been deleted and reinstated. I suspect because the grey area leaned in their favor. With no solid proof, this comes to a mod/admin making a decision based on substantial stuff. No hard evidence of anything (in their favor or against them). For me it doesn't matter I trust admins make the correct decision.
First of all, assumption is the mother of all fluff ups. That counts when making leadership decisions, admin decisions or whatever decision you attempt to make. Looking at this thread it's FULL OF assumptions. So guess what you guys are all breeding on?
I've lead succesful FFA tags with the brothers in it. (AoDT, CC and maybe he was even in Project DOOM can't remember)
I personally can not for 100% gaurantee that Donny/Billy is a legit duo playing or even were a legit duo when I lead. Why not? Because while i've seen and heard the duo playing. There's no 100% gaurantee that they are legit (as goes for any safelisting).
Besides that it is not MY or YOUR decision to delete / ban him. It's that of the mods and admins. And when it comes to having principals most people believe their judgement should be trusted (atleast from what I read)
Looking at how a 1a situation a few years back where RD hacked into GHQ and other clansites we gathered hard proof. Viable evidence tying different things together. There was no questioning, no gray area. It lead to bans, deletions and the FULL RD tag being deleted.
Looking at the current situation Donny and billy have been deleted and reinstated. I suspect because the grey area leaned in their favor. With no solid proof, this comes to a mod/admin making a decision based on substantial stuff. No hard evidence of anything (in their favor or against them). For me it doesn't matter I trust admins make the correct decision.