you guys want to initiate hits with us all set then midset change your retal policy when you realize we're coming out way ahead on the retals? i dont think so.


no idea why you want to do these silly land exchanges with us, but we're not letting you off with trying to landgrab laf so often.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcrbM1l_BoI - courtesy of a retired advisor

So rage has a clan almost 4 times its size dec war based on LG's you clearly could have let be and win from?

staying classy i see LaF

Pew pew pew

Its not about land grabs. We all know that.
Its ok. Have a good war eug and laf.


Bullies always get nut checked eventually.

Confirmed. We do what we always do. What we want. If you want a piece of the action, get in line ;)

my land, my land....DAMN YOU!

hahah lame.

well we didn't initiate most of em that's for damn sure

also you guys were the ones telling us we should modernize our retal policy

so whatever have fun

also 2/10 on the war dec, not amusing enough

ah to clarify, i think you guys solidified my original leave of this game. oh well, it is funny to think LaF has to dec war on rage and waste resources on them. suckers

This is stupid.

*golf clap*

it is stupid but regrettably LaF chose the path

We are La Famiglia. Lower your turrets and surrender your acres. We will add your architectural and technological distinctiveness to our own.
Your clan will adapt to service us.
Resistance is futile.

Obviously LaF feels threatened by Rage.

Lotta fear can be heard in that war dec...

:)

This would be a classier Dec than the crap used in the first post.

That's how laf get their land, don't you know that already? Last set was EVO, this set is rage.

geeez Red X you join laf and start a war but never wanted to fight when you were in tie!!!

I still can't believe this game exists with fluff moves like this every set.

Red is in Laf?

red x is in laf.

sick

my fellow bannerman! let us be gracious until they are vanquished or bend the knee!

This game is pretty much fluffed up with politics, hate, spite wars, 3:1 or even 4:1 members ratio wars. It reaches new bottom-lows levels, set after reset. One side ( lmao at block pacts ) pretty much outnumbering and dominating the other one.

This server has max. 12 more months until it droops under 300 players.

And then literally no one supported lafs war dec. Time for a real server war.

Coming soon to a reset near you: LaF vs everyone

lol nice ITM

I love that YT video and song.

But fluff LaF! Bully fluffes!

But nice choice of song though. fluff!

Too brave. Be aware people. If you want to avoid the server wars then dont be so stupid as to change your retal policy ever again! Also don't lose landgrabs against Laf and give them land. They don't like that anymore.

1 I am not a leader in LaF at all. I am a recruit.
2 What does TIE have to do with this?

LAWL LaF claim moral victory in their war dec.

Gawd your awful allies.

I'm with ITM on this one, plus who doesnt want to tag kill LaF reset after reset.

But anyways GL LaF in killing 19 inactive countries. Btw if you dont finish this by Friday it'll be really sad. ;)

Ok, let me get this straight, you're saying this is over grabs that you have been coming ahead on, and yet you war us and kill.
Doesn't that remove the land that you find so precious?
I have been away for awhile, but its nice to see LaF hasn't changed.
theres much to be said about consistentcy.

next time why don't we all just cut the cr@p, unzip and compare eh? that's what this is really about

I'm happy to judge, all pics to please.

no, at least 1 Rage country was coming out ahead in grabs on them and they couldn't have that so they decided we all die...oh well

LaF is pathetic...truly pathetic. BTW LaF, we will not bow down and be your next EVO. We refuse to alter our stand due to your dilligence in being complete flufftards. Yes you have some of the best players in the game I am not denying that, but when it comes to class and dignity you guys have none.

And #222 was the initiater in this friggin quad tapping us out of the gate and day after day and you guys bounced around excuses on retals....

http://www.earthgraphs.com/...port=Show&tab=details

so before this started laf did 24 grabs and rage did 24 grabs...

laf land from rage = 26,770A avg 1115

rage took from laf = 16,461A avg 686 a grab

lets see who started the mess...

http://www.earthgraphs.com/...07%3A29&donews=Search

hmmm looks like laf did a tripple tap on rage to start it off to see how we would react... a test for sure.

don't laf have a 80% l;l clause?

Clearly LAF was baiting Rage, and having Rage return some hits is unacceptable.

SOL+MD+RAGE should turn around and pin LAF against the wall next set for being assholes.

Guess I pretty much know what I'll be doing for the next 3 -4 sets ;)

BOOOOOOOOOOO - You would think that LG's would be welcome especially if you are coming out ahead.

Super Lame.

79 vs 20. Well have fun. Dont be lame and kill all set. Just tag kill and move on.

LameFamiglia

If I was a 20 man alliance I probably wouldn't have refused a pact with an alliance almost four times your size. Don't let it get in the way of playing victim though.

Can't fix dumb.

Be their next Evo? Not sure how we bowed down in any way...

this wardec is lacking tits as well


booo

I still see some RAGE people still alive, this is disappointing!

I don't know; since it was posted, several have turned up to have their say...

so the first part you say RAGE initiated the hits all set when the first 4 grabs were made by laf countries... in fact the first three was by the same laf country
2013-10-14 11:47 Vection (#222) [LaF] meow (#277) [RAGE] PS 877A (+193A)
2013-10-14 11:46 Vection (#222) [LaF] For the Kids (#238) [RAGE] PS 931A (+242A)
2013-10-14 11:45 Vection (#222) [LaF] DANGER WILL ROBINSON DANGER (#334) [RAGE] PS 667A (+277A)

and all 1 min apart .. wow good player to be able to do three searches, ops and get set up unless they planned on hitting three times to spark a fight...

yes RAGE changed the retal policy mid set in fact it looks a lot like your 80% l;l policy - it can't be all that bad if laf uses it can it? So i have to believe it can't be the policy its self.

Many other alliances have made amendments to their policy mid set and have not gotten killed over it. hmmmm maybe show some kind of proof where it says someplace that retal policys can only be changed ( blank ) of face death. do you have any?



Come on this is LAF the best of the best and the smartest players in the game... but can't you come up with a better excuse and think your dec war threw next time... to many flaws.

c-


in the second part you say that you are not letting rage off with grabbing you so often... of the 24 exchanges 6-7 of then were intiated by rage, the rest of the 24 were started from your side

please explain that one.

after further review

D is all you get

The man posted his dec. If you don't like it I'm sorry but he doesn't have to further explain for you.

all i can do is read what he posted and after dong some fact checking ask where it came from. if he does not want to reply that is totally up to him but maybe he sees something i am not.. unless i ask i will not know.

It could be the reason posted in the dec or maybe a 20 member clan shouldn't talk and try to act like a 90 member alliance?
but by all means keep making threats and etc, because I am sure that will inspire LaF to pact you ever again. LaF surely won't hold a grudge and will have no desire for easy land next set.

I am impressed that Rage can generate as much whining as a 90 member alliance.

Let's see, Rival can take on Rage, SoF can destroy SOL, and LaF can destroy MD. Or any combination of such. In a manner which will leave LaF comfortably sitting in the top10 by end of the reset.

Because let's face it--whenever you try to take on LaF, you'll inevitably have their allies tripping over themselves to pick up whatever is left.

How can anyone in this thread even think this is a good move?

LaF is too big, i bet if the big 4 (LaF, SoF MD SoL) all split tags in half. This server would be 10 times better.