Verified:

Riddler Game profile

Member
1733

Aug 25th 2013, 10:56:04

You're a bunch of fluffing idiots. Just my opinion. It is no wonder tags don't survive this server. You try to farm them then when they retal according to policy you guys can't accept it and threaten war? What a bunch of fluff.

bertz Game profile

Member
1638

Aug 25th 2013, 11:53:05

They will continue to be like that unless:
-all haters grow some balls to fight them
-leave this server

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Aug 25th 2013, 12:06:55

.

Edited By: locket on Aug 25th 2013, 19:54:31
See Original Post

Soultaker

Member
472

Aug 25th 2013, 12:16:42

Or it might be cos of this:

2013-08-22 23:37:35 PS Erehwon (#127) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 440A (675A)
2013-08-22 18:14:03 PS to be the best (#60) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 541A (813A)
2013-08-22 16:38:19 PS use the schwartz (#516) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 1396A (1979A)
2013-08-22 11:23:31 PS Sith thucks (#37) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 1002A (1417A)

and:

2013-08-24 13:17:00 PS Erehwon (#127) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 270A (455A)
2013-08-24 13:09:53 PS Ackbar (#433) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 363A (598A)
2013-08-24 11:10:09 PS Sith thucks (#37) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 826A (1167A)

:)

BladeEWG Game profile

Member
2191

Aug 25th 2013, 12:24:24

Yeah Soultaker
That was the agree upon retals for his 4 hits on a Rager.
Whats your point?
Wouldn't other tags kill for 4 grabs?
Or is that changed here now also?

BladeEWG Game profile

Member
2191

Aug 25th 2013, 12:24:52

Sorry I'm just asking, they don't let me do FA

Soultaker

Member
472

Aug 25th 2013, 12:36:05

no, i was just pointing it out... how you deal with it is your problem

Riddler Game profile

Member
1733

Aug 25th 2013, 13:00:57

Locket in case you didn't know, and u obviously don't. I am with Rage. We are trying to bring back an alliance to add to the game. Asfar as not being iinvolved in the massive war, well it seemed stupid to me to get involved in a war when we started with 5 members. We are currently trying to rebuild the alliance.

Soultaker, you want to point out the obvious escalating retals for a quad tap? Ok so be it. If you guys don't like oir retal policy DON'T fluffING TRY TO FARM US!! You guys fluffed up and want to threaten war lmfao, what you don't realize is we don't give a fluff. We have nothing to lose

BladeEWG Game profile

Member
2191

Aug 25th 2013, 13:02:41

Then to be fair we need to show the start of this.
Aug 21/13 5:43:31 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) 116 A (+54 A)
Aug 21/13 5:43:29 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) 126 A (+108 A)
Aug 21/13 5:43:26 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) 113 A (+139 A)
Aug 21/13 5:43:15 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) Defence Held

BladeEWG Game profile

Member
2191

Aug 25th 2013, 13:08:30

The excuse was he didn't know he tagged up Rage.

elvesrus

Member
5054

Aug 25th 2013, 13:20:31

I'd say #786 declared war on beer before making a country
Originally posted by crest23:
Elves is a douche on every server.

Soultaker

Member
472

Aug 25th 2013, 13:24:30

Originally posted by BladeEWG:
Then to be fair we need to show the start of this.
Aug 21/13 5:43:31 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) 116 A (+54 A)
Aug 21/13 5:43:29 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) 126 A (+108 A)
Aug 21/13 5:43:26 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) 113 A (+139 A)
Aug 21/13 5:43:15 PM SS Mustangs For The Win (#169) (LaF) Rafe On (#786) (RAGE) Defence Held


true i saw it after but was too lazy to edit :P but i think you could work it out without warring or so i hope :P

aqua Game profile

Member
102

Aug 25th 2013, 13:32:18

Hmm

Heretodie Game profile

Member
175

Aug 25th 2013, 14:07:32

Yah Locket we've had this conversation in Pms now, there's no land left to farm in 1A and DK is killing all the fluffing land farm there is.... which is separate topic. Don't be shocked if LaF wars with you, they are bigger then you and they need land farm so they can make an effort to get a top 10.

My opinion LaFs player shoulda been put into FARM for a week and if LaF didn't like it to bad. He made a 4 times hit on a player and forfeited his country. They want to declare war on you, next set you know what alliances to talk to who want to war with them.

CandyMan Game profile

Member
708

Aug 25th 2013, 14:09:33

2013-08-24 13:17:00 PS Erehwon (#127) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 270A (455A)
2013-08-24 13:09:53 PS Ackbar (#433) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 363A (598A)
2013-08-24 11:10:09 PS Sith thucks (#37) RAGE Mustangs For The Win (#169) LaF 826A (1167A)

These hits were made after the 48 hr retal window specified by LaF policy. Rage has some weird policy where 24 hr window is added to each hit after 1 hit to extend the window. A 4 tap would have a retal window of a whopping 48 + 72 = 120 hrs.

LaF welcomes new alliances back to the game, but we will not accept unreasonable retal policies, especially considering most reputable alliances would allow an accidental 4 tap over a couple hundred acres to be addressed reasonably. Rage decided to get multiples of land back within 48 hr while going for even more with their ridiculous retal policy.

Edited By: CandyMan on Aug 25th 2013, 14:20:19
See Original Post

Pain Game profile

Member
4849

Aug 25th 2013, 14:12:23

looks like a case of retal policy dispute and LaF won.
Your mother is a nice woman

Darrian Game profile

Member
392

Aug 25th 2013, 14:48:06

LaF hasn't won anything. We hit them back and now they are pissed. They want everyone to fear them. They threaten war. Really? That's original. 84 versus 22. Cool but those odds could be bad for an alliance their size.

Anyway Rage came back In hopes to liven up the game. Apparently it is working now.
Lets not forget, you called your own member an idiot for the hits. Its ok to be a little embarrassed about all of this but don't worry Rage won't look down on you. Much..

~bad as i wanna be~

Makinso Game profile

Member
2908

Aug 25th 2013, 14:50:55

Being a sol head fighting the bloody war! I still agree with riddler on this.

Rage would have gotten no chance to even Become a real tag again if they drove themselves straight into this war

Pain Game profile

Member
4849

Aug 25th 2013, 14:57:57

Originally posted by Darrian:
LaF hasn't won anything. We hit them back and now they are pissed. They want everyone to fear them. They threaten war. Really? That's original. 84 versus 22. Cool but those odds could be bad for an alliance their size.

Anyway Rage came back In hopes to liven up the game. Apparently it is working now.
Lets not forget, you called your own member an idiot for the hits. Its ok to be a little embarrassed about all of this but don't worry Rage won't look down on you. Much..



if your retal policy is really what candy says, no alliance in this game will accept you extending it 24 hours per hit. you guys got over 1000% L:L back in the standard retal period. this is what being greedy gets you.
Your mother is a nice woman

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

Aug 25th 2013, 15:00:07

Originally posted by Heretodie:
Yah Locket we've had this conversation in Pms now, there's no land left to farm in 1A and DK is killing all the fluffing land farm there is.... which is separate topic. Don't be shocked if LaF wars with you, they are bigger then you and they need land farm so they can make an effort to get a top 10.

My opinion LaFs player shoulda been put into FARM for a week and if LaF didn't like it to bad. He made a 4 times hit on a player and forfeited his country. They want to declare war on you, next set you know what alliances to talk to who want to war with them.


Oh well if we are killing them, taker/outlaw thought he was gna try to fluff us around with dumbass retal policies. Our reason for killing them is sound
The Death Knights

XI

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9092

Aug 25th 2013, 15:01:19

Makinso, read CM's post again. Would SOL accept a 120 hour retal window for that>?

BladeEWG Game profile

Member
2191

Aug 25th 2013, 15:32:42

Funny even tho I've been away a very long time things with LaF haven't changed much eh?
Now we play the RoR game?
Go figure.

Vamps Game profile

Member
857

Aug 25th 2013, 15:41:45

I think I'm going to go start an alliance and will dictate new policies to alliances 5x my size for my benefit. When it doesn't go well, I will complain until the alliance becomes so annoyed with me they surrender to my demands. Sounds like a solid plan, right? Who's with me?


WHAT? RAGE BEAT ME TO IT?!

Oh well, so much for missed opportunities.

Darrian Game profile

Member
392

Aug 25th 2013, 15:45:10

Ha ha we didn't start this. Their member that they call "an idiot" did.

I'm sorry if everyone else wants to bow down and be a coward over things.
~bad as i wanna be~

133tz Game profile

Member
764

Aug 25th 2013, 15:58:44

Dictating policies to all unpacted alliances on the server that are ridiculous is pretty much a threat of war to all those who hit Rage lol!
I am an EE noob.

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4327

Aug 25th 2013, 16:06:50

Then don't hit Rage if you don't agree with their retal policy.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

133tz Game profile

Member
764

Aug 25th 2013, 16:09:07

lol it's like me starting up another 15 man alliance and dictating a 1000% L:L policy and hoping I'll get away with it :)
I am an EE noob.

Darrian Game profile

Member
392

Aug 25th 2013, 16:10:18

I asked for pacts several times over. All ignored or never answered.
Again, we didn't start this issue. Period.

~bad as i wanna be~

euglaf Game profile

Member
408

Aug 25th 2013, 16:10:56

no alliance in their right mind would give you 120 hours to retal

Darrian Game profile

Member
392

Aug 25th 2013, 16:13:49

Originally posted by NukEvil:
Then don't hit Rage if you don't agree with their retal policy.




Best statement yet!
~bad as i wanna be~

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4327

Aug 25th 2013, 16:16:38

Originally posted by euglaf:
no alliance in their right mind would give you 120 hours to retal



No alliance in their right mind would allow you to quadtap one of their members.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

euglaf Game profile

Member
408

Aug 25th 2013, 16:22:35

i'll lose 300 acres to a 4 tap for 3000 acres in retals any day.

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Aug 25th 2013, 16:42:02

Originally posted by Riddler:
You guys fluffed up and want to threaten war lmfao, what you don't realize is we don't give a fluff. We have nothing to lose


You know what? LaF has nothing to lose either. Come war us over your ridiculous retal policies.

P.S. You can only dictate retal policies if you can actually back it up. So many people fail to understand this on solo servers, and apparently, on clan servers too.

Edited By: Xinhuan on Aug 25th 2013, 16:44:18
See Original Post

tellarion Game profile

Member
3906

Aug 25th 2013, 16:54:30

Originally posted by euglaf:
no alliance in their right mind would give you 120 hours to retal


Yeah, they should have just killed the offending country. Does 4+ hits no longer equal a kill?

Darrian Game profile

Member
392

Aug 25th 2013, 17:07:51

"P.S. You can only dictate retal policies if you can actually back it up. So many people fail to understand this on solo servers, and apparently, on clan servers too.Edited By: Xinhuan on Aug 25th 2013, 16:44:18. Reason: NONE"

Aren't you guys so proud to be the bullies . Yeah again....LaF created this issue . Not Rage..

~bad as i wanna be~

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Aug 25th 2013, 17:09:11

According to their retal policy, it isn't. In fact, the word kill isn't even in the policy.

tellarion Game profile

Member
3906

Aug 25th 2013, 17:11:22

Originally posted by Xinhuan:
According to their retal policy, it isn't. In fact, the word kill isn't even in the policy.


According to Rage's policy? What about your policy?

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Aug 25th 2013, 17:18:11

I won't even pretend we're not bullying. But then again, I'm not in charge of anything in LaF, so you are welcome to take my words with a pinch of salt. Or sugar.

Bullying can be interpreted both ways. You are using your small clan size to try to bully your way through (with ridiculous retal policies) by using AT as a propaganda platform.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Aug 25th 2013, 17:18:27

Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by Xinhuan:
According to their retal policy, it isn't. In fact, the word kill isn't even in the policy.


According to Rage's policy? What about your policy?


rage decided to try to enforce their policy, why does LaFs policy have to do with it?

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Aug 25th 2013, 17:29:35

Nothing. I didn't bring up LaF policy. I just disagree with Rage's, and I'm willing to war over it.

My leaders might think otherwise of course.

(I was only stating that Rage's retal policy doesn't involve killing, even if they were hit 100 times, not just 4 times.)

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4327

Aug 25th 2013, 17:35:22

You're only willing to war over it because you know your alliance will win. In fact, LaF is only pursuing this because they need another source of land.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

Darrian Game profile

Member
392

Aug 25th 2013, 17:40:47

That is exactly right Nuk but they weren't counting on us arguing about it. I am not a puppy. We don't just tuck our tails .
~bad as i wanna be~

Killa Game profile

Member
269

Aug 25th 2013, 18:00:27

Come on, when rage was 300 members and a 40 man tag tried to enforce something on you would you?

Lets bring it back. If Forsaken tried to enforce L:L on rage during TIL would you accept? No.

Stop crying, have your FA's actually do work and understand the state of the game and move on.

Or

Retal Laf back and die.

There is no middle ground anymore.
+Killa

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9092

Aug 25th 2013, 18:12:01

Originally posted by NukEvil:
. . .LaF is only pursuing this because they need another source of land.


That's exactly wrong. If we just wanted their land Eugene would have opened their tag up to the members of LaF to LG. Would you like him to do that?

Darrian, why do you think only this one LaF guy hit you? Because we are all scared and he is the only one with the balls to do it? Think again... If we just wanted your land we'd already have it.

It's actually quite the opposite.

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4327

Aug 25th 2013, 18:25:47

See, that's the thing about LaF. They don't usually take an action at another alliance's expense for no apparent reason. They constantly look for excuses to start something with another alliance when they need something. LaF feels it needs to justify its actions to the Earth community so they can get away with everything they do. No matter how flimsy the excuse, LaF will use it when they get called out on something.

A problem I see with this strategy, is that LaF doesn't need to find an excuse. They're the largest alliance on the server, with the largest war alliance backing them up. Finding an excuse just slows everything down, and just delays LaF reaching its objective.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9092

Aug 25th 2013, 18:32:49

Nuk what you said makes no sense in the real world buddy.

dannydk Game profile

Member
87

Aug 25th 2013, 18:38:45

I would just retal back the overretals or kill the offending country or countries

War seems like the only way to solve the problem here, if there is a problem that is.

Whoever loses isn't wrong. Whoever wins isn't right.

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Aug 25th 2013, 18:41:49

You must have misunderstood my posts NukEvil. I didn't make up any excuse. I essentially said "we disagree with you, come war us".

archaic Game profile

Member
7012

Aug 25th 2013, 18:46:05

The whole server is filled with tags too chickenfluff to do anything about it, so this is what we deserve. Even when we have a decided advantage, somebody always pisses their panties and pulls a Sir Robin.

Set after set, same crap. Its like we all have collective Stockholm syndrome, every time a few tags decide to rise up - the rest of the oppressed go running to the masta' looking for a deal. If you listen carefully you can hear Turtle Crawler laughing at us.

Cheating Mod Hall of Shame: Dark Morbid, Turtle Crawler, Sov

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9092

Aug 25th 2013, 18:46:06

Originally posted by Xinhuan:
You must have misunderstood my posts NukEvil. I didn't make up any excuse. I essentially said "we disagree with you, come war us".


Also don't forget Nuk doesn't even play Alliance he is only here as an agitator. He has nothing to do with Rage. He only dislikes LaF.