Mar 16th 2012, 0:57:04
Originally posted by anoniem:
I think landtrading is a good way of recreating the land lost due to suiciders/kamikaze members etc, other than that i wouldn't really participate., not because it's wrong, but because i dont want to play the game that way.
Originally posted by anoniem:
actually evo's pact wouldn't allow for back and forth trading, as a country may only be grabbed once every 48hrs. personally, i prefer it that way, as it don't "abuse" the system.
personally, i think it'll become a sad state of affairs if everyone adopts landtrading (i.e. the blindly back and forth grabbing over extremely short periods of time), because there will be no competitive element and the whole server will be running on 100k turrets lol :P
ah well, we all have our opinions! even if some are closer than others.
---
how has that got anything to do with evo? i could have an opinion that landtrading is perfectly legitimate whereas my alliance doesn't allow it.
how the fluff does foreign affairs relate to internal policy on landtrading? allowing landtrading in an alliance is a collective issue, NOT A fluffING PERSONAL one. i stated how i'd personally prefer to play the game. got a problem with that then don't read my posts. wanna perceive it as evo's policy then fine. maybe tomorrow i'll post that i personally prefer doing 100:1 esc. retals - you can then define my personal opinion of what i like as evo policy. (see i can make ridiculous nonsensical posts like you too)
come to england -i'm sure we can do something about your grasp on english, particularly the understanding of written word.
I think landtrading is a good way of recreating the land lost due to suiciders/kamikaze members etc, other than that i wouldn't really participate., not because it's wrong, but because i dont want to play the game that way.
Originally posted by anoniem:
actually evo's pact wouldn't allow for back and forth trading, as a country may only be grabbed once every 48hrs. personally, i prefer it that way, as it don't "abuse" the system.
personally, i think it'll become a sad state of affairs if everyone adopts landtrading (i.e. the blindly back and forth grabbing over extremely short periods of time), because there will be no competitive element and the whole server will be running on 100k turrets lol :P
ah well, we all have our opinions! even if some are closer than others.
---
how has that got anything to do with evo? i could have an opinion that landtrading is perfectly legitimate whereas my alliance doesn't allow it.
how the fluff does foreign affairs relate to internal policy on landtrading? allowing landtrading in an alliance is a collective issue, NOT A fluffING PERSONAL one. i stated how i'd personally prefer to play the game. got a problem with that then don't read my posts. wanna perceive it as evo's policy then fine. maybe tomorrow i'll post that i personally prefer doing 100:1 esc. retals - you can then define my personal opinion of what i like as evo policy. (see i can make ridiculous nonsensical posts like you too)
come to england -i'm sure we can do something about your grasp on english, particularly the understanding of written word.
re(ally)tired