We enter this war against EVO with very little bad blood between our Clans in the past.
we suspect that EVO harbours ill will toward us, in the form that they have had IMAG blindside FS us.
Even though they were easy enough to deal with, we again have proof that EVO has continued to FA IMAG countries so they could continue to hit our restarts.
So in what we feel is justified defence, we will now remove the head of the snake instead of playing silly buggers with the tail.
EVO, consider the war begun, the battles will be many and memorable, but we will prevail in the end, and we hope no ill feelings will continues to linger after the smoke clears.
RIVAL hereby declares war on EVO in defence of the right to exist without underhanded aid to its enemies.

-PG-

RIVAL LaF LAPDOGS

Where's LaF's war dec?

If you wanted no ill feelings to linger you shouldn't have asked for Laf to break a pact to hit EVO. KJ was right, you really are a dumb fluff.

hello gangbang.

I have never seen bigger fluffs than slagpit and kj, so slagpit calling PG a fluff is funny fluff.

So what you are saying is that it is 100 + to 43. For proclaiming to have the best warriors you both really take the pansy way out. Your clans must have a bunch of women in them both because you need to learn how to grow a pair

or the didn't feel like fighting you and just wanted to distroyed quickly and easily.

wow

fair enough PG, goodluck and see you on the battlefield.

diez
Evo VP

http://forums.earthempires.com/...p;p=1324702891&page=1

JAJAJAJAJA

O.O

lol I got it right!!!! yay... oh fluff we never placed any real bets... epic fail

Does this mean you wnt try to finish my country off??

At least Laf AND Rival are leaving some oil on the market for evo to fight back with

You have very good reason to declare war on us. I have been urging you to do so for days. Fair play.

Rival vs Imag/evo, I LIKE it!!

wait so you were pushing RIVAL to declare on you?

Yes, I admit to encouraging Rival to hit us. I also offered them various different wars with us. I was pretty upfront about it. The claim that we had iMag hit Rival is totally incorrect, of course thats our word against Rivals claim. But its an insult to iMag to try and claim that they would listen to us! They are iMag they do what the hell they want!

And the idea of having even wars this set has been pissed on.

Has the constant conversations I have had with multiple alliances meaningless? Has the idea's and willingness for even wars just a fools hope?

Don't worry, Jiman.

LaF will get to break their pacts and get away with it yet again because most of the rest of the server cares nothing about the community anymore.

LaF Logic: All wars should be even (except when we're involved, then we gangbang).

I have yet to see LaF be in an even 1v1 war.

They were in 2 even 1v1 wars with SOL. They lost both of them because of poor target selection.

My question is, what is Rival gaining in gang banging with Laf?

I mean, Rival has every right to war Evo. They have there reasons.

My question is why Laf is involved when they have a pact?
In defence of Rival btw? Evo didnt attack Rival.

I see no honor in this current situation.

Why did LaF war EVO last set? Why did LaF war SOL this set? You think they care about honor out of all things? Get a clue Jiman.

I dont want to see Rival be sucked into a bad image with laf like this.

hahahahahaha

is kind of tricky

why?

because LaF clearly broke a pact
because EVO wanted RIVAL to declare on them.
because EVO added a few tricks to their uNAP with LaF.

First with the performance of EVO vs SoF, I could see them beating RIVAL easily, if RIVAL had the FS then MAYBE it would had been a long war (with Evo claiming victory anyways).

Now RIVAL had the ball in their court, they could FS and earn a hard victory, or ask around if someone else was willing to help them.

Now here we have LaF felling cheated because the terms of their uNAP are slightly different than the ones they hoped to have (same as SoF as your logs claim KJ), so lets say RIVAL asks LaF for help, and a pissed LaF said yes.

is a little hard to relate to EVO because they wanted to put conditional terms and crap to their uNAP with LaF, and that is exactly what led them both to last set fluffstorm, LaF should just come clean and say that they disliked KJ little trick and when RIVAL asked them for help they gladly agreed to it.

however, I'll be honest i am biased, i don't like either, but Evo only has old man RON on their ranks, while LaF has more than a few people that I know (back from when Ely joined them)

The pact you're referring to Chaoswind isnt in place until next set. I posted the entire pact in another thread. This set Evo and LaF signed a standard LaF term uNAP that we had signed with LaF in previous sets.

you fluffing crack me up ,i can't stop laughing

you really are a dumb fluff.

when you want to make a point you should have at least some kind of vague proof to back that up.
we did not hit Rival for anyone except for us (Imag).
as a matter of fact we only hit you because (as stated in the war dec) you declined our uNap when 2 sets ago we were trying to go on a friendly stance with you guys.

LMFAO PG

Full of fluff. Everybody knows Imag acts solo. If Imag does not want to do something they won't. Imag just wants to kill and die or kill and live either way kill is the word.

In no way has Evo orchestrated for imag to hit Rival LOL

Session Start: Sun Dec 18 20:02:30 2011
Session Ident: PG
[20:02] Session Ident: PG (Earth-Empires, iTavi) (Spehthanse@EE-7532D0CC.fullrate.dk)
[20:02] <PG> yes
[20:02] <iTavi> cool lol
[20:03] <iTavi> hard to find you
[20:03] <iTavi> you hiding from me?
[20:03] <PG> jup
[20:03] <iTavi> great
[20:03] <PG> lol
[20:04] <iTavi> so, wanna renew the unap?
[20:04] <PG> not this set
[20:05] <iTavi> k cool
[20:05] <PG> sorry
[20:05] <iTavi> no prob. i thought so since we've been reaching you that hard
[20:05] <iTavi> and marco can't sign things
[20:06] <PG> yaeh im the only one doing pacts
[20:06] <PG> so i can keep tract of what happenign

Session Start: Sun Dec 18 20:11:06 2011
Session Ident: ibujke
[20:11] <iTavi> yo
[20:19] <ibujke> hey
[20:19] <iTavi> rival doesnt want pact? i guess they'd want to hit us? dont know why
[20:19] <iTavi> so should we?
[20:19] <ibujke> hit them?
[20:20] <iTavi> yup

Session Start: Sun Dec 18 20:11:06 2011
Session Ident: ibujke
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM
[20:11] <iTavi> yo
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM
[20:19] <ibujke> hey
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM
[20:19] <iTavi> rival doesnt want pact? i guess they'd want to hit us? dont know why
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM
[20:19] <iTavi> so should we?
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM
[20:19] <ibujke> hit them?
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM
[20:20] <iTavi> yup
[LoL] <Yank> SHUT UP YOU WILL HIT THEM

I fixed it so PG can feel justified.

tx

if imag went solo they wouldnt have DP's and get called in right? same goes for any clan that has DP's and doesnt want to get involved

[20:04] <iTavi> so, wanna renew the unap?
[20:04] <PG> not this set

This proves PG to be a LIAR and a LAPDOG. Congratulations.

sweet!

What a joke. If it was possible for LaF to sink any further into the abyss, they just did.

RIVAL, wtf are you doing?

I lulzed

This is the most funniest and stupidest thing you have ever said. You should check facts before you wreck yourself. You must of forgotten the beginning of the set.
Fact #1:
I went to Marco looking to pact you all. He sent me to you.
Fact #2:
tavi went to you to get a pact, you declined.
Fact #3:
logs with marco.....
<Marco> Well pg refused a pact...
<Marco> And we were all set to net
<galleri> then why do you refuse to pact?
<Marco> Because pg is a noob
<Marco> Thats what I'm saying, make sure thats all known in your dec
<Marco> That we can't net now because pg refused a pact

Rethink your excuse......
this is as bad as hanlong's err...LaF's pactbreaking.

Im confused why you're all focused on Imag reason for hitting.

It seems to me EVO has it coming for blatantly starting crap and mass FAing Imag which is more than enough to reason to hit them IMO.

Exactly and we wanted Rival to hit us. Rival hitting Evo is not an issue. We gave you every reason to. I don't know why you guys had to beg LaF to BREAK a PACT to hit us with you, but whatever... We will take it as a compliment that you knew even if you got the FS on us we would have won =)

BattleKJ is lying dumb fluff

LOL if you are confused, reread the first post

And reread mine.

hmmm
imag fdp with evo......

that means evo is in the rights to mass fa imag, and there is no pact that evo has with rival that states anything about evo not being able to fa imag in wartime....

You make me hard. :)

if we wanted to hit rival, we would have done it already.

But rival has every valid reason to hit us due to our fa packages.

It's just sad they decide to call another alliance in. But goodluck anyway.

If Evo wants to claim the right to define FA as not part of war, then Rival is in the right to FS them due to a dispute of that definition.

Can't have it both ways. Unless, of course, you think rules don't apply to you.

I came back at the right time.