Originally posted by smikke:
ibujke: Do you think the war with LCN against you had something to do with Soviet threatening us on AT and iMag denying us a uNAP?
We had no reason to give a uNAP. You threatened us as well, so this is moot.
Originally posted by smikke:
Obviously there was some element of retaliation involved, both LCN and Fist were pissed off at iMag, but fact is we were told that you guys were going to hit us again AND we had a uNAP refused...
And iMag was pissed off at you. You are saying being "pissed off" is a valid war reason? Or that you dont mind wars for no or invalid reasons?
Originally posted by smikke:
So there goes your excuse for this set ;)
We dont need an excuse. As far as I`m concerned the war with Fist didnt end two sets ago.
Originally posted by smikke:
And we still think the original "reason" was crap because we had no FA contact from you guys and we still insist it was one country sending FA.
I dont have a problem with you feeling wronged. I do have a problem with you and some other people not saying the full story. The only iMag war in EE that was reasonless was the one against Laf. Honestly I considered that war a 'thank you' to Pang.
Anyhow, fact is TIE received a considerable amount of FA and you were caught doing it. I think its safe to assume you did most of it. As for FA contact, why would it be mandatory? Did you make FA contact before FAing TIE? Did you make FA contact before FSing iMag the set after?