I also stand by the fact that alliances can police themselves. If Sof is griefing enough people or Laf or Evo then someone is going to get people together and kill them. There may be political sides but those change and they rarely stay together forever when they have no reason to do so.

I also stand by the fact that alliances can police themselves. If Sof is griefing enough people or Laf or Evo then someone is going to get people together and kill them.

Yeah, it's ridiculous that people leave these guys alone, only to see them completely fluff people up later in the set. But if he's incin, the douchebag just doesn't give a fluff about anything. He grabbed us 4 days before the set ended based on something that happened over a month before and had nothing to do with him.

But, I'm just a sheep that doesn't know how to play the game, apparently.

Again, you're blinded. Every thing I've done I've done with an purpose in mind, And this reset I was Jungle Welcoming Party (#333)

It seems like PDM just did something to make 375 hate them, and so they got some just desserts. Solution, don't be •sshats and people won't make you hurt. Wars aren't the only way to "enact revenge."

yea huh

i borrowed it from you remember. duh

Nobody seems to have any issues with alliance attacking alliances over bullfluff that happened many many resets ago...

How come it's a big deal when a lone country does it?

There ain't no magical men in black mind erasing metallic dildo that blanks our memory at the end of each reset.

maybe EVO needs a few constant suiciders to see how annoying it is. although pang doesnt seem to care much about it either.

locket while i agree with you that there is reasonable amount of defense those PDM countries clearly did not have reasonable amounts for that many missiles to get through.


I also agree that some members of this community should be banned for their actions, kj for one, hence why i helped kill him every time he popped up, but banning someone for suiciding, imo is not an option the mods should take.

what if that person feels they have been unjustly hurt by that alliance and this is the only way they can pay that alliance back? do alliances then get warnings for being unproductive members of the community and the possibility of the alliance being banned???

Alliances get suicided on due to leadership decisions, if you rage quit the game because you get suicided due to a leadership decision then that is your choice, however smarter choices would be to join an alliance that doesnt get suicided on or have leaders make bad decisions

(p.s. yes i know what i just said is completely and utterly hypocritical because i hide in an alliance and then suicided its allies to hurt the alliance i hide in, but no one does that anymore :P)

100k tech? to make 1 million bushels a turn. u need far more then 100k tech

Incin if he gets to near max SDI he still loses land but he also loses out because chances are fairly good that all that money he spent goes to waste when no one hits him and then someone who was more greedy beats him. Netting is about opportunity costs and you clearly do not understand that. There is a reasonable defense and I'd say he more than had it for the SDI especially considering no one should want to suicide him as he didnt hit anyone who would do that this set.

That being said, having 6 million turrets, 39% sdi tech does not "justify" you keeping your 95k acres.

SDI is a deterrent as much as it is useful. Defend your land. I understand what it takes to net in this game. In fact, I used to be a huge treehugger who lived for netting. But, since you don't really know me or my past performances, you have no way of knowing that. I also know what it is get get kicked in the face as a top ranker, and I learned a long time ago to defend against it.

That being said, having 6 million turrets, 39% sdi tech does not "justify" you keeping your 95k acres. It more says, I'm pushing the limits, move along, nothing to see here. When you're on top, people naturally want to beat you down.