Verified:

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Jan 29th 2014, 9:07:08

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:

I call B U L L S H I T, man made global warming M Y A S S!!!

Have a swirvey day darling :-)


See that's the thing about scientific evidence in a reality-based world, The opinions of willfully ignorant buffoons just don't matter.

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Jan 29th 2014, 8:38:37

Originally posted by RaTS FYA:
I also think global warming is shady science. They don't have anywhere near the data they would need to accurately judge that. Earths climate has changed so many times before industry, that a 100 years of data just isn't enough to make conclusions.


"Shady science" ?? "100 years of data" ?? are you serious?
We have hundreds of thousands of years of data on atmospheric CO2 and it's correlation to climate. And we have 150+ years of hard data on the rise of atmospheric CO2 since the modern beginnings of the oil industry. There is NO controversy within the global scientific community. One study alone found that from 1991 to 2012 there were published 14,000 peer reviewed scientific papers that supported human causes behind global warming (chiefly from burning fossil fuels over the past century), and just 24 that rejected human cause.
If you ever want to talk about conspiracy nuts start with those that believe human contribution to global climate change is a myth. You are just mired in your own ignorance.

http://www.weather.com/...d-global-warming-20140122

http://www.livescience.com/...e-core-in-antarctica.html

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

And if you think vaccines cause autism you're just as loony as the climate change deniers and flat earthers and the fake moon landing believers and the 911-was-an-inside-job whackamoles and the dinosaur-fossil-dating-methods-are-a-hoax lunatics and the Obama-is-a-ferrinner mouthbreathers.

http://scienceblogs.com/...ndrew-wakefield-continues

http://www2.aap.org/...lies/autismwakefield.html

Damn! The Stupid is strong on AT. Sadly, even among game moderators trusted to make decisions based on evidence.

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Jan 9th 2014, 3:52:16

Originally posted by farmer:
polar vortex my ass what the heck is with these weather people having to come up with new terms and starting to name winter storms. used to describe it as bitter cold or some other adjective an now trying to tie it to global warming,god i hate greenie weenies


"new terms" lol are you a dittohead Limbaugh zombie?

The polar vortex was first described as early as 1853.[5]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_vortex

At AMS, we have been publishing the “AMS Glossary of Meteorology” since 1959, and in that first edition, AMS did define the term ‘Polar Vortex.'
http://www.ametsoc.org/...news/2014polarvortex.html

Be better than a Rush Limbaugh dittohead

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Dec 26th 2013, 10:44:55

Originally posted by lostmonk:
Originally posted by theHitch:
Bigots and racists circlejerking with other bigots and racists.

Hold onto your religious texts tightly, it's what you cherrypick to justify your hate.


Phil Robertson in 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDHr8GR-e-4

Eat any seafood lately? Wearing mixed fabrics? hypocrites!
~~you're going to die~~

Looks like it'll take at least another generation for the dinosaurs to die off.


If you want to argue religion, at least get your facts straight. Christianity believes what it says in Scripture that Jesus abolished all the laws of the old testament except for those which he reiterated. So throwing out old testament law to call people hypocrites just shows you are ignorant about what you're trying to argue about.

-
Well we do have this
Matthew 5:17
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil."
hmm Jesus displays not the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament. They stand as is, apparently unless specifically 'tweaked' by his word. And no where in the New Testament does he mention homosexuality.

So the Old Testament verses about homosexuality stand. As do most all the other ridiculous laws, of which I chose to paraphrase two in my previous post;

Leviticus 11:10
And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you

Deuteronomy 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together.

Well except if you listen to Paul's POV in Ephesians and Romans, in which yes i guess much of the OT was just a sloppy typo and you can now disregard.

But even Jesus gets a little confused in Luke:
16:16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
16:17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.

Well, unless you would prefer Exodus
12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever
or 1 Chronicles
16:15 Be ye mindful always of his covenant; the word which he commanded to a thousand generations
or Leviticus
23:14 ..it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations in all your dwellings

It's all very confusing. You would think the perfect word of God as given to us savage humans via The Bible would have a little less contradiction. When God laid out the Old Testament, he knew the New was coming around the corner, right?

A perfect word, from a perfect being, wouldn't leave all that wiggle room for cherrypicking. It is, after all, The Most Important Communication Ever. Or so It says.
Can't The Perfect Word be a bit more consistent?
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/otlaw.html

But back to Phil Robertson and his comments.. because in his own defense he states ‘All I Did Was Quote From the Scriptures’

What does Jesus say about homosexuality?
go ahead, google it.
Nothing. Nada. Zip.

Jesus does say in Matthew:
7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

So by Jesus' own words, it seems not many at all will get into heaven.
Especially if you have wealth:
Matthew 19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

But Jesus says nothing about the gay. Paul is attributed to some anti-gay sentiments but prior to translation he may have been speaking of the child temple prostitutes (both male and female) or the practice (in Paul's time) of adult males taking teen boys 'under their wing' for tutorship and sexual favor.
Interesting (but not surprising) that this Ducky Phil Robertson only seems to hate on the male prostitutes btw lol


I'm glad I'm a straight (sorry to disappoint you scode), far-from-wealthy atheist, otherwise I'd be so confused by scriptures that I might have to play the odds at 50/50 no matter my predilection :

Luke 17:34
I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.

Luke 17:35
Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

There ya go. You can increase your odds of going to heaven all the way up to 50% if you, ya know, get your gay on.

and #1 on the list of cherrypicking by Phil R and sooo many other Good Christians, and most regularly ignored:
Matthew 7:1-3
Judge not, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?
-
Phil Robertson doesn't just get his hate on for gays. Look at the spectrum of his statements.
That's why I added the link from 2010 in my previous post, it helps to provide a context for his ignorant views.
Or check out this article: When You Defend Phil Robertson, Here's What You're Really Defending
http://www.businessinsider.com/...-really-defending-2013-12

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Dec 21st 2013, 13:55:52

LOL unemployed? You DO know they were wealthy before this stupid A&E fake reality show right?

btw the GQ interview with P.R. wasn't just about gays, he made some monumentally ignorant statements about blacks in the south during his youth too.

I never watched Duck Dynasty, and never will. Most likely due to the fact that I have an IQ in the triple digits.

http://youtu.be/KW343K1-upo
^NSFW^

Edited By: theHitch on Dec 21st 2013, 14:05:04. Reason: link NSFW, language
See Original Post

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Dec 21st 2013, 13:01:07

"clap"
"clap"
"clap"

for the town alcoholic bigot, a clown on a unicycle

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Dec 21st 2013, 12:53:46

Bigots and racists circlejerking with other bigots and racists.

Hold onto your religious texts tightly, it's what you cherrypick to justify your hate.


Phil Robertson in 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDHr8GR-e-4

Eat any seafood lately? Wearing mixed fabrics? hypocrites!
~~you're going to die~~

Looks like it'll take at least another generation for the dinosaurs to die off.

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Dec 18th 2013, 5:24:02

"These programs were never about terrorism: they’re about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They’re about power."


nailed it

theHitch

New Member
EE Patron
9

Dec 15th 2013, 22:25:45

13 April 1949 – 15 December 2011