Originally
posted by
anoniem:
what i find funny here: sof take into account what other clan's "normal members" say on AT, but when their members decide to troll/gloat then it's ok cos they aren't sof leaders, but just "normal members".
have some consistency!
Actually I would say there is a massive difference.
The exchanges on AT right now between most of the SoF members and PDM are the usual war banter. It happens and it makes things interesting. I will admit I find some of the comments from both sides distasteful, especially some of the recent ones from SoF. But I think AT needs some drama. But the point is that it is current. We are still at war. If my members start flaming PDM when the war is over they can expect to be flamed by me.
Now when members of other Alliances start flaming (and I won't call it trolling because I have seen very few actual trolls here, as trolls do not post emotionally) Alliances including my own when we are not in a state of war over issues that are past then I do consider it out of line.
A few years ago on AT it used to be mainly dagga (and a small handful of others) whining and complaining constantly about past perceived indiscretions of other Alliances, but these days it seems to become more and more common. Or maybe too many good people left and the percentage of "flamers" is much higher.
People seem to feel the need to voice their anger over things that happened long ago. Build a bridge and get over it... or quite simply... put up or shut up.