Verified:

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 25th 2012, 2:00:27

<3

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 25th 2012, 1:06:13

Lest we forget.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 25th 2012, 0:17:13

Anoniem that line you keep posting that I said... I do not know why you think that to me some big secret!

I posted on the MX site why I hate ICN, why I want to wipe them from the game and why I wouldn't do it in detail... with another ICN member on there discussing it with me! It is no secret ;)

You could have just copied that thread instead as you are on that site :p

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 24th 2012, 5:03:26

Arrogantly stupid? Like the time you and your buddies in GoD FSed LAF and got your asses handed to you, then you were on a 1 man crusade against LAF for the following 4 years?

Or like in 2006 when your alliance Elysium decided to get together with allies and FS IX, only to have IX FS you the next set with you crying all over AT?

Yep, gotcha.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 24th 2012, 4:50:16

Rule the game? I am sorry to say for you locket, you were clueless 5 years ago and you are still clueless today.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 14:10:21

Helmet don't let facts get in the way of a good ideological crusade!

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 14:03:47

I love how you bring "Tyranny" into it like we are trying to oppress you. That whole forcing our policies thing on you has not been applicable since Helmet approved a pact minus the land-trading clause one week before you FSed us. We have never sought to force any land-trading policy on you since.

Also, did you ever try to negotiate said policy with SoF? Try to find some middle-ground? No.

You are carrying on an obsolete crusade and calling SoF behind the times?

I know you are better than this Detmer. I was a DP of yours for years and I always loved PDM. I was on your side regarding the land-trading policy and was doing all I could to seal an agreement between SoF and PDM. Now I have the power to approve such a deal yet you are not even interested in negotiating it. That is being stubborn.

If you choose to be stubborn that is your call, but I can be stubborn as well.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 13:32:20

I am happy for it to continue if you so wish.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 13:13:31

Do you think that attitude would have gotten you far 5 years ago? I know the last Alliance that used to act like that got FSed every set till they eventually left the game. For some reason now it is acceptable?

For some reason you guys seem to bypass the negotiation component, go straight to thinking you can act as you like and then point blame elsewhere when things do not work out how you wanted.

Originally posted by Helmet:

List of stupid things to do to an alliance you don't want to war with:

1) Defuse their missiles. (check)
2) FS them when you were told specifically by their president they would not attack you. (check)
3) Lie on the At that you didn't defuse the missiles. (check)
4) Insult the alliance slaughtering you, after you started the war. (check)
5) Telling them you're going to get them in future rounds (check)
6) Trying to form an coalition against them the following set. (check)
7) Lie on the At that you didn't declare war the previous set. (check)
8) Keep poking the bear. (check)
9) Refuse pact offers. (check)
10) Continue to piss off the alliance you previously warred with and then when war happens cry that they're a bully. (check)
11) After you get your ass beat a second time make the same threat again. (check)


I think you guys need to chill out and start thinking things through better.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 12:34:50

lol

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 11:13:53

lol love the list

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 10:18:22

Drow I think you are mistaken if you think we are "going to roll in it". It is that attitude which lead to this set, I suggest you re-evaluate it for next set or you might not like the result.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 3:58:53

Actually dagga, I have never fought Evo. SoF has, I have not.

If SOL don't want to talk to me that is their own call. I have nothing to lose by not talking to SOL. Fortunately for SOL, Jiman is a credit to your alliance.

I have my reasons for hitting PDM. I tried very hard to establish amicable relations with PDM. If their leadership cannot bring themselves to even sit at the negotiating table whilst at the same time also making threats and plotting, well anyone in that situation should not expect things to end nicely.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 3:38:37

What people forget is that when I left this game I was one of SOL's closest allies and I even owe SOL a favor. But, SOL has not treated me nice since I returned and noone except Jiman has contacted me ;)

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 3:34:16

Ninong is a tree-hugging pansy and therefore SoF do not recognize LCN as a policing force.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 3:12:19

Well unless Jiman was talking to someone else, we had not gotten that far in our discussions regarding a friendly war. Jiman and I were still discussing a pact and I had given him the concerns from SoF leadership about our last pacting negotiations. I also expressed that I would like to talk to Maki. We have not yet concluded such discussions, albeit as I have been busy dealing with PDM.

I was intending to war with SOL at a later stage if circumstances permitted. I did expect that the PDM war would be over within a short time and we would just have to restock for another war.

I found out about LAF wanting to make a move on SOL only a short time ago. I had asked another SoF Head if they could ask if it was possible that LAF leave SOL for us but I had not received a response. But I think by that time LAF would have already been committed.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 23rd 2012, 2:52:33

Hanlong this was against my orders. You have some explaining to do.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 23:03:59

The fact that you have such a problem with what I posted regardless of the relevance of it's context does indeed show you have an inferiority complex.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 22:54:27

If you think that my post is a big claim then you keep showing how large your inferiority complex is.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 22:48:19

I don't think you are proving anything to anyone dagga, just showing everyone how big that chip is.... except they already know.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 22:40:10

Let me know how that inferiority complex works out for you dagga. And get some selleys for that chip on your shoulder.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 22:28:05

Wait, the nerdrage from dagga over this is still going to feed me...

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 22:27:42

It would be awesome if they just posted that this was all because of dagga. The nerdrage from dagga would feed me.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 7:02:09

I hope we see you back with us one day in the future Eric :)

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 4:07:30

Just because someone else labels someone a communist does not mean I have. Others have labelled PDM as such to portray the socialist marxist style policies PDM wish to promote.

That is the great thing about the Internet, everyone can share their opinion. Others just spend more time forcing their opinions and beliefs on others.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 3:51:09

Alin's posts are incoherent.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 3:30:49

Angel1 I do not believe everyone is demanding the release of the results only a select few who wish to use the results of other alliances to further their own arguments. Their persistent posts to pressure you make them appear to be a majority but they are not.

I believe the more prudent approach is just to release the results to individual alliance leaders of results relating to their own alliance and leave the decision to release each alliance result up to them. I have no problems releasing results for my own alliance.

The results are not an accurate depiction of the majority of players anyway.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 1:35:59

From now on Hanlong I'm blaming you for everything.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 1:21:11

Sounds good Req!

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 1:14:35

I think it's amusing people think LAF had any input into this, but we shall let the conspiracy theorists speculate ;)

It's all Hanlong's fault.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 0:37:48

See, unlike you I wasn't sitting on the sidelines in obscurity back when we were killing Arrow for consecutive sets.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 0:21:11

Actually NukEvil you know very little.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 22nd 2012, 0:19:54

Ahh NukEvil, forever holding the candle for us.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 21st 2012, 3:19:02

Flamey there was more to it than the land-trading. For me personally this is about failed politics and intentions.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 21st 2012, 3:00:07

Some of you should stockpile some tissues.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 21st 2012, 2:30:04

PDM decided to put their alliance at risk in their stubborn Arrow style approach to SoF. SoF decided to add a price to that risk.

Let me know how the Arrow style politics works for you Pang.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 21st 2012, 2:24:23

Originally posted by Requiem:
Hey snupi, go suck a fluff while your at it.

You fluffing fag loving, boner licking, piece of sof fluff.


The nerdrage is strong in this one.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 21st 2012, 1:33:48

<3

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 21st 2012, 1:32:34

See one thing has been evident to me these recent weeks... Somehow some leaders have come to think of alliance politics as being dagga-style posts on AT.

This game is about politics and always has been. Real politics is about negotiating and dealing in the best interests of your alliance. If you want to play stubborn that is your call bit it didn't work out too well for Arrow... Let me know how it works out for you.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 16:12:50

So defensive. Keep at it... It might work for you eventually.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 15:11:31

Wrong Pang. I did care for PDM and Detmer and have a history of that dating back a decade.

What I don't care about is your defensive rants. But keep trying to flame, it's still amusing me.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 14:19:54

I don't speak for Ivan. We all know how he works. Maybe you all care too much.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 13:48:38

Always so defensive and emotional. Every comment you don't like is an "attack" or a "troll". Ivan makes one comment yet has triggered paragraph upon paragraph of emotional or defensive responses. And you try to say you don't care.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 13:28:25

I haven't even started pretending yet and you actually believe I care. You clearly care too much. I am amused however at how emotional you are over the politics of this game.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 13:18:38

Keep posting, the butthurt amuses me. I tell you what, to make you look better and to improve your public image I'll pretend to care.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 13:04:36

I don't care enough about either of you and your over-emotional rants to even try to answer them. Let me know how playing that martyr card works out for you.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 12:48:20

I find it amusing how one SoFer makes a comment and you all nerdrage against SoF. Nerdrage more. You will.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 2:31:23

fazer's determination to try and form his own alliance in this game is to be admired, but the roads taken to achieve this are certainly not.

What fazer doesnt realize is that these indiscretions tally up and damage credibility. Each indiscretion makes it more and more difficult for fazer to achieve his goal.

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 2:28:33

I wouldn't call him a suicider as such. He is playing in an unconventional style, but everyone is entitled to play the game as they see fit. As he is not targetting particular alliances every set and merely retaliating I do not believe that really to be the actions of a suicider.

However, I do believe he does this for attention seeking and posting on threads like this feed that ;)

Sov Game profile

Member
2509

Apr 20th 2012, 2:25:58

The mobile pages are an interesting one. I do believe that it is in need of improvement. It works, but it could be nicer.

Also, as stated on many occasions I believe an iPhone app to be of great potential to the future of the game.