Originally
posted by
Warster:
No it's exactly your point,
We shouldn't be mad at you cos you didn't break any rules, but if big tags did whatever they wanted within the rules they would get abused by all those they hit and kill.
You attacked a tag that avoid all this kind of crap, we don't make rules, we just follow along with the server, yet every time people like you want to make a point we get targeted.
That's what we are annoyed about, in the last 14 netting sets we have had I don't recall more then 1 set where someone hasn't come along to make a point about the server.
Like I said we didn't care about the grabs , the missiles were the issue, we can agree to disagree on the term used for your actions, doesn't change the fact it was a fluff move against a tag that never touched you
It doesn't bother me if you're mad - that's between you and your own intellect. Regarding your incessant and ridiculous assertion that I was a big, bad SUICIDER..... did any of you check the news? Did you happen to see the attack progression? The attack strategy went like this: EMs - PS - NM.
1. Would any of you brainiacs care to venture a guess why?
2. Did I think that I would suffer retribution from Drinks. Yes. From The Monsters as a Clan? Yes. How much from both if any? That remained to be seen. I might have lasted a few days and it would have been a fun battle.
3. Did I monitor The Monsters at any point in the set to know or see whether or not they were netting or warring? No. Why would I have? So to accuse me of intentionally ruining a set is intense stupidity. Like I said at the outset... "It's a witch, burn her!"
4. Did I think that another clan was going to come in out of left field and kill me? It didn't cross my mind. Did it bother me? No. It's a wargame. I, did however find it interesting that another clan took it upon itself to provide apron strings.
5. Is it ok for a player in this game to play the game according to his or her own strategy?