Originally
posted by
Tertius:
GDI provides protection for a price. If you don't want to pay for the protection, you can choose that, but that doesn't nullify any other country's protection from being in GDI.
If the issue is humanitarians, then that is different - but I think all of these have been explained a number of times in the forums previously.
Great explanations both. Thank you.
To follow up on your explanation- so essentially, a larger country that is in GDI can attack a smaller country, not in GDI, as many times as the larger country wants, wirh zero fear of any repercussions correct?
If that is the case, do you think that the developers inherently want all countries to be in GDI?
There seems to be very little benefit, if any, of not being in GDI. Just an interesting dynamic.