Oct 15th 2013, 15:52:48
I understand and I appreciate your position.
But remember SoF is not LaF. Take your issues up with LaF. I think you would have done a bigger service to your position if you waited to FS LaF instead of jumping on SoF. It was LaF, not SoF, that decided to end TiVo's netting goals because of some sort of netting disagreement. I can't see any reason for SoF to have engaged Evo last set, this set, or any set in the near future. I think you may have misread the situation....but again I can sympathize with why you would have done so.
Aside from some sort of failed FA incident, I don't see the need for conflict between SoF/Evo. I do recognize that FA matters can be muddled for both sides because of past differences and general dislike between specific members and leaders. However, I think "goodwill FA relations" between SoF and Evo can overcome those challenges.
But remember SoF is not LaF. Take your issues up with LaF. I think you would have done a bigger service to your position if you waited to FS LaF instead of jumping on SoF. It was LaF, not SoF, that decided to end TiVo's netting goals because of some sort of netting disagreement. I can't see any reason for SoF to have engaged Evo last set, this set, or any set in the near future. I think you may have misread the situation....but again I can sympathize with why you would have done so.
Aside from some sort of failed FA incident, I don't see the need for conflict between SoF/Evo. I do recognize that FA matters can be muddled for both sides because of past differences and general dislike between specific members and leaders. However, I think "goodwill FA relations" between SoF and Evo can overcome those challenges.
Edited By: MauricXe on Oct 15th 2013, 16:06:09. Reason: added last para
Back To Thread
See Original Post
See Subsequent Edit
Back To Thread
See Original Post
See Subsequent Edit