Jul 15th 2013, 0:04:13
[quote poster=Atryn; 25484; 470606]
That wasn't proven either.
The lack of proof of one story doesn't make the other guy's story suddenly proven true.
martin wasn't on trial, and his actions were secondary to zimmermans being at fault (outside of jackson and sharp, who rallied behind this cause? their constituency? why am i not surprised?)
under a court of law, with a fair trial and jury, yes, some very well might argue it does prove this.
Originally posted by Angel1:
Originally posted by Junky:
Zimmerman didn't fight, not that the government could prove. Trayvon Martin chose to turn this into a fight.
That wasn't proven either.
The lack of proof of one story doesn't make the other guy's story suddenly proven true.
martin wasn't on trial, and his actions were secondary to zimmermans being at fault (outside of jackson and sharp, who rallied behind this cause? their constituency? why am i not surprised?)
under a court of law, with a fair trial and jury, yes, some very well might argue it does prove this.