Jan 10th 2012, 22:05:59
also Scode:
"The uNAP can be voided if one of the parties of this pact is involved in a war with one of the other parties FDPs
"
i re-read it again. it never says "at war" it says "involved in a war". i said at war here to summarize, but the actual phrase in the pact was "involved in a war"
evo was also technically involved in a war with rival when they were FAing imagnum countries.
and when rival hit evo, they were definitely involved at that point.
it really is a really badly worded void clause written on kj (on purpose?).
"The uNAP can be voided if one of the parties of this pact is involved in a war with one of the other parties FDPs
"
i re-read it again. it never says "at war" it says "involved in a war". i said at war here to summarize, but the actual phrase in the pact was "involved in a war"
evo was also technically involved in a war with rival when they were FAing imagnum countries.
and when rival hit evo, they were definitely involved at that point.
it really is a really badly worded void clause written on kj (on purpose?).
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia
Don of La Famiglia