Verified:

Unsympathetic Game profile

Member
364

Jun 22nd 2011, 2:40:15

Hm? The upper tax rate is not the way that class of people earns their actual income.. from investments much more than nominal income. So I don't know why this is even a question, because it's a sleight of hand.

And Junky, 45% is too low, it should be Eisenhower's rates of 70%.. you know, when America was the most profitable and successful that it has ever been. It must really chafe kneejerk Republicans that Obama's tax rates are lower than Bush or Reagan.. and to realize that Reagan raised taxes 13 times.

Also, at no point has a lowered tax rate brought in more revenue: Bartlett left the Republican party because of that childish nonsense.

Remember, it's not socialism for the top 1%.. it's fascism for them.. because they run the businesses that have captured their regulators.

Edited By: Unsympathetic on Jun 22nd 2011, 2:44:58
Back To Thread
See Original Post