Verified:

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5055

Sep 9th 2024, 22:08:04

Hi all,

I apologize for doing a poor job last round implementing the planned changes. I hope to do better this time. Here's what I'm currently thinking:

0) Remove tech allies. The purpose of this change is to lower the amount of tech on the market and to allow tags more flexibility in strat choice (a tag of 10 might feel obligated to run 4 techers every time under the old system).
1) Reduce max turns from 240 (480) to 180 (360).
2) Remove the Communist bonus effectiveness penalty.
3) Add a bonus called something like "Supercharge construction sites". THIS CAN ONLY BE USED ONE TIME PER ROUND PER COUNTRY. This would cost 24 bonus points and would do the following:
a) All permanent bonuses accumulated so far are removed except for earthquake damage reduction.
b) BPT is infinite for the next turn only. Normal building costs still apply.

Option 3 could be used for demo techer conversion, MBR conversion at low land, tech start switches, and general switching of strategy in the early part of the round.

Please comment as soon as possible if you have any feedback on these or other changes.

Edited By: Slagpit on Oct 1st 2024, 1:32:34
See Original Post

VicRattlehead Game profile

Member
1994

Sep 9th 2024, 22:22:27

Well that certainly is a spicy new dynamic! I like it! That changes things significantly.

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9473

Sep 9th 2024, 22:27:51

Hmmm that all sounds pretty damn cool. I like giving techer an endgame option like that. Having more MBRs would be good for everyone if you want to do any kind of public jump IMO.

At risk of being wrong– I endorse this as a Premium Patron member.
I financially support this game; what do you do?

slip Game profile

Member
310

Sep 9th 2024, 22:31:08

- What is the point of the max turn reduction? I like that its one of the big differentiators of the server. I'm going to assume it was created to get casual players back and not have to login as often but what ended up happening is it leads to huge jumps at the end of the round?

- Cool.

- Love it. I think there was some thread where it was suggested that each round had one "wacky" change so the meta changed from round to round. Regardless of what happens, point 3c is going to lead to some legendary forum posts.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5055

Sep 9th 2024, 22:38:43

Originally posted by slip:
- What is the point of the max turn reduction? I like that its one of the big differentiators of the server. I'm going to assume it was created to get casual players back and not have to login as often but what ended up happening is it leads to huge jumps at the end of the round?


It was meant to be a differentiator of this server since we can't do it anywhere else. The benefits were to make it easier for casual players and to give advanced players more strategic options on how to play their turns. I think that the current numbers at 240 (480) led to too much market distortion and benefits casher and farmer too much. 180 (360) is still more saved turns than any other server allows.

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9473

Sep 9th 2024, 22:55:50

Re: the turns thing. I think it's fine to trim it down some but please don't go too far. I like to be able to go on a vacation IRL and not worry about losing turns as much if I want to take a break and not be a nerd around all of my family on holiday.
I financially support this game; what do you do?

Turtle Crawler Game profile

Member
673

Sep 9th 2024, 23:21:19

Big nerf of cashers/farmers and boost to techers, with no compensation.

VicRattlehead Game profile

Member
1994

Sep 9th 2024, 23:33:26

Originally posted by Turtle Crawler:
Big nerf of cashers/farmers and boost to techers, with no compensation.


Wouldn't the increased prevalence of MBRs at the end of the round benefit cashers and farmers by making it more cost effective to destock on public?

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9473

Sep 9th 2024, 23:34:47

Can you elaborate?

While it might be a nerf to them it might not be depending on what techers switch to it could still help. Let's say some go MBR and provide more units on the pub and cashers and farmers can public jump some. But keep in mind my casual nature and not needing to play for several days; don't compromise that further!

But maybe you are thinking of something I am not.
I financially support this game; what do you do?

Red X Game profile

Member
5168

Sep 10th 2024, 1:47:46

A) Why is turn storage an issue? From a casual player’s perspective, I actually prefer it. I disagree with your point that it impacts market stability. If that’s truly the case, adjustments could be made to the bots or additional bots could be added. What really destabilizes the market is 100% decay and players not needing to defend their land, which lets them cash out without expenses, keeping resources untouched.

B) I’m unsure of the full impact this change would make.

C) This devalues building costs, as players could convert all their land in one turn after going decay and having the cash ready. I dislike this from a strategic standpoint.

Edited By: Red X on Sep 10th 2024, 2:17:39. Reason: Flow
Red X, MA
Mercenaries for Hire
Something or other
——————————
Hells Saints
Dictator
——————————
Coalies Twin

VicRattlehead Game profile

Member
1994

Sep 10th 2024, 2:24:09

They would lose the decay bonus though, that would be a waste I think - unless I'm thinking of it wrong. Seems like turns is better if you're going to lose the bonus.

Or is it still better for a techer to take decay, and take the losses on the one big build before jumping you think?

Red X Game profile

Member
5168

Sep 10th 2024, 2:31:50

Originally posted by VicRattlehead:
They would lose the decay bonus though, that would be a waste I think - unless I'm thinking of it wrong. Seems like turns is better if you're going to lose the bonus.

Or is it still better for a techer to take decay, and take the losses on the one big build before jumping you think?


When you convert govt you do not lose bonus. Just like when you die your restart has it.
Red X, MA
Mercenaries for Hire
Something or other
——————————
Hells Saints
Dictator
——————————
Coalies Twin

Red X Game profile

Member
5168

Sep 10th 2024, 2:57:06

Thanks for pointing out something I missed. I still believe it would have a larger impact than intended. I believe that being able to grow to a crazy size and build shift everything will have a larger impact and boosts other strats. Love the idea but hate this in practice.
Red X, MA
Mercenaries for Hire
Something or other
——————————
Hells Saints
Dictator
——————————
Coalies Twin

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5055

Sep 10th 2024, 3:05:27

Building 400k empty acres all at once without any building cost bonus costs around $480 billion.

Red X Game profile

Member
5168

Sep 10th 2024, 3:50:26

Originally posted by Slagpit:
Building 400k empty acres all at once without any building cost bonus costs around $480 billion.


I don’t see people going that high just to about 120-150k doing that. I see the point you are trying to make but I do not like a few of these changes for the reasons stated above.
Red X, MA
Mercenaries for Hire
Something or other
——————————
Hells Saints
Dictator
——————————
Coalies Twin

Gerdler Game profile

Forum Moderator
5111

Sep 10th 2024, 21:22:23

Honestly, I think what this game needs is stability more than further huge changes. That said;

I don't have a huge problem, nor am I very much for any of these changes, Except the turns thing which imo is needed and wont bother casual players ability to play casually. 540 turns is still 8 days worth of turns(with bonuses).

I do not like the motivation: "techer is bad this round so lets make techer better".

You should be thinking along the lines "well the swings between the favored unfavored strats are too large lets find some way to make a dampener mechanism"

The game experience for people who happen to pick the wrong strategy is horrible for 2 months, which is something you can't afford. 2 months is long enough that people will quit over it in the worst case, and you will force people onto the "safe" strategies, and even worse you will make winning into a coin toss competition.

The switching mechanism is interesting, but huge and it's consequences unforseen. I do think it will provide a means to escape your strat if techer becomes really bad or provide perhaps a way to switch a tech start faster. Which is somewhat interesting. Not sure its needed.

I think a dampener for tech and military prices going too far off course is needed. And it shouldn't be about bot composition, unless you make them switch strats halfway based on price points. It needs to be a reactive mechanism.

KoHeartsGPA Game profile

Member
EE Patron
30,104

Sep 10th 2024, 22:01:13

Originally posted by Slagpit:
Originally posted by slip:
- What is the point of the max turn reduction? I like that its one of the big differentiators of the server. I'm going to assume it was created to get casual players back and not have to login as often but what ended up happening is it leads to huge jumps at the end of the round?


It was meant to be a differentiator of this server since we can't do it anywhere else. The benefits were to make it easier for casual players and to give advanced players more strategic options on how to play their turns. I think that the current numbers at 240 (480) led to too much market distortion and benefits casher and farmer too much. 180 (360) is still more saved turns than any other server allows.


Ehm...express is 360 (360)
Mess with me you better kill me, or I'll just take your pride & joy and jack it up
(•_•)

https://youtu.be/...pxFw4?si=mCDXT3t1vmFgn0qn

-=TSO~DKnights~ICD~XI~LaF~SKA=-

S.F. Giants 2010, 2012, 2014 World Series Champions, fluff YEAH!

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5055

Sep 11th 2024, 5:41:46

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
Originally posted by slip:
- What is the point of the max turn reduction? I like that its one of the big differentiators of the server. I'm going to assume it was created to get casual players back and not have to login as often but what ended up happening is it leads to huge jumps at the end of the round?


It was meant to be a differentiator of this server since we can't do it anywhere else. The benefits were to make it easier for casual players and to give advanced players more strategic options on how to play their turns. I think that the current numbers at 240 (480) led to too much market distortion and benefits casher and farmer too much. 180 (360) is still more saved turns than any other server allows.


Ehm...express is 360 (360)


True. I suppose it's better to talk about in terms of daily turn storage. Express can store 2 days of turns. Coop could store around 8 under the new rules.

Tertius Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1640

Sep 24th 2024, 15:30:43

Will next round have any change to bot strategy and/or proportion of playstyles?

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5055

Oct 1st 2024, 1:32:47

Changed point 3