Originally
posted by
tellarion:
Sov has or had red access in rage's site, he was running rage's warchats against lcn, and then sol/md, and he even claimed he was posting as darrian on at(yes, i have logs of this too).
So when people say sof was running rage last set, they have legit reasons to say that. You can dispute that all you want, but it doesn't change the facts of the situation.
Originally
posted by
tellarion:
Oh, and then there's the conjecture and observations, such as rage gaining 10 members midset and sof losing 10 last set. Or Sof members telling others they were in rage last set. But meh
1) I fail to understand how running joint WCL for alliances during a war is saying that one clan is running another. So is MD running SoL, PDM, TPA, etc this set? No prolly not, at least not because they are running joint WCL's. I joined at very end of war last set, think was last 2 days, and just starting my country it was not ready to participate. By time it was ready the war was over. Those last couple days however there was a joint SoF war channel, have no clue about prior. This does not mean SoF was running RAGE however.
2) RAGE gaining 10 members midset is just that .. purely conjecture. I know of at least 4 of us that joined RAGE last set from Juice's old game. You would have to ask Juice how many were recruited, but I think it was more than that. I dont know how many were already in RAGE prior vs how many of us just joined. But I do know at least 4 of us just started. There were couple others including iScode that were recruited from the server. None of which came from SoF, except maybe iScode (havent really followed all that drama, but seems like I heard was in SoF but could be mistaken). At any rate that is only one that might have. I dare anyone to send me proof of SoF tagging up as RAGE in pvt email or I will even discuss it in pvt.
3) I can also tell you that all clan decisions are made by RAGE leadership. Getting advise from others like SoV is just that, an advisor and friend, than RAGE makes up its own mind what it wants to do.
4) I have heard some of the reasons from various RAGE members as to why supporting SoF as well as dropping two FDP's. The mentality is basically the same from every RAGE member I have heard and has nothing to do with SoF running RAGE. FailDiegoFail has already posted in AT some of those reasons. Why not ask RAGE leadership if you really want to know, as I am sure they will tell you.
RAGE may have done a lot of things recently, but one thing they did well was heavy recruiting last set and this set, which brought some old ragers back, recruited others from server as well as brought new players to game from another old game. It was a successful recruitment and had nothing to do with SoF. The relationship between some other clans changes just like it does in RL, but it is just simply a close relationship and not any kind of take over. RAGE respects it current ties with SoF, but who knows that may change in the future or it may not.