Sui game change: go from removing missiles to just disabling them
10:34 Sui and user don't know until launched
10:34 req that would be cool
10:34 Sui reduce quick chem kills
10:34 req oh
10:34 req and
10:34 req instead of it launching when u try it says "failed to launch" and you still lose turns for the attack
10:34 req or something like that
10:34 Sui sell firing pins on the market
10:35 Sui failed to launch wud be awesome
10:35 req so not only do you waste their missile you also waist their turn(s)
10:35 Sui and no readiness recovery if the missile fails to launch
10:36 req make a post, soudns fun
10:36 Sui jj, u writing this fluff down?

Nah when they fail to launch they should backfire and blow your fluff up

100+ nukes exploding at same time would be very devastating.

Gud call DruncK

Marshal, when I need your opinion I will give it to you :)

Adding a negative consequence for failed missiles would be an interesting element but I think Warfare tech would need a small buff if that were implemented..

Great ideas sui

Yeah. It seems obvious that when you sabotage a missile it just blows up on launch. This is a science endorsed change. Good call sui. Otherwise itd be called disable missiles and not sabotage.

But would be insane to nearly die from sabbed missiles. They'd have to be slightly narfed on the return or they'll become a non-commodity. Or some just blow up after takeoff and cause no damage.

i like the idea of sabo'd missiles hurting your country rather than just going.. would make sending them when you know you have been hurt like that questionable to send, a bit like bio terror does.

Unfortunately, I think more realistically, this would simply lead to people ditching their missiles period, rather than run the risk. So it'll fluff warring up more as well.

People cry about earthquakes, imagine having missiles blow your fluff up....yeah... LOL

If you're getting this elaborate..shouldn't failed harmful spy ops become public?