i dont care if it's classy or not... i mean, i seem to recall you bragging about running Elders off the server. How was that classy?

Derrick, If i dont remember wrong we just retal 200% l:l and that covers "topfeeds" also.
Before that it was "A topfeed is defined as a landgrab more than 400A in which the retaliation attack will obtain less than 80% of the lost land back" according to our policies page. Has nothing to with NW.

Below is some i have gathered from past pacts they are from 2016 or older:
Ill get some more when i get bored.

Evo:
-125% Land:Land on topfeeds(Defined as the defender having 125% of the attacker's land at the time of the hit)

TIE: (also Defined as the defender having 125% of the attacker's land at the time of the hit)
125% L:L for TF 80% L:L for regular
later
200% L:L on TF's alliance wide

SoF:
All grabs/attacks will be retaliated 300% land:land (not including ghost acres), DH will be retaliated 1:1 escalating in the case of multiple hits.
Later
- Any landgrabs, special attacks, spy ops and missile attacks will result in FAs deciding a course of action.

Rival:
80% L:L C:C, 200% L:L alliance wide last 3 weeks of reset

Omega:
- Countries may not grab countries with more than 150% their land. For LGs over 150% land of the attacker, retals are to be taken at a flat rate of 200% land:land.

MD:
All grabs will be retalled 200% Land : Land excluding ghost acres.

Imag:
- 200% land:land on all hits, 1:1 on defended. PS & SS will be the only acceptable forms of retalliation.

SoL:
During non war times, any landgrab is retalled 2:1, Defense Held 1:1

ICN:
150% L:L for all single hits

"IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN, I SHALL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE."

#246 didn't actually break any policies that warranted a kr did he?

We are a new 1a clan, we are looking to net and would appreciate any other clan that puts us on DNH.

*yawns*

Wtf are you talking about? I was never in RD, and I've never been deleted. I left LaF because Ingle is a shady douchebag. Since you want to make accusations about me in public though, let's explore my history with LaF:

I left LaF because of Ingle. Ingle abused his admin rights in LaF (as IA at the time) to delete my posts on the team board after multies associated with his team string were deleted, and I attempted to question him about it on the LaF team boards to see who was involved. Earlier that set he had also been deleted in express, so I felt I had some justified concerns. Shortly after I questioned him, I was "coincidentally" suicided out of top 10 on by one of his team alliances' members (see my post above for my thoughts on Archaic).

Archaic claimed that he suicided on me because I had a good country and that he had a problem with how PDM was treated by LaF. But he suicided on two countries specifically, and Candyman and Eug both confirmed that no one from PDM had attempted to contact them with concerns. It was a bullfluff excuse.

I left LaF quietly because I couldn't trust Ingle, but I didn't feel like making a public display, since I still had lots of friends there. Since you wanted to make this public though, let me be perfectly clear...

I hit you last set because you pissed off a player who I have a great deal of respect for, and I felt obligated to help. Your FA practices last set resembled that of a spam tag. You attempted to force your policies on others and followed it up by posting policies on AT.

You want to make this personal? Fine. But don't blame anyone but yourself and Ingle. LaF leadership is the sole reason why I've grown to enjoy hitting the tag.

Peace out, I'll be seeing you soon.