Search For Author: flameo - Earth Empires Forum

flameo

Member
202

Mar 28th 2013, 7:14:15

Well the American and the British were able to break Japanese and German communication code (respectively) and hence they got all the intel they need.

In 1943 or so, The American and British were inferior to the German in many ways, however they were able to avoid German U-boat patrol in the Atlantic to stop Merchant Ships.

In the Pacific theater, The IJN was far more superior, even after the increase in US naval production. It is true that they wre stretched in regards to controlled area and available forces. However, the breaking of IJN comm code causes huge lost of veterans seamen and pilot (and the incapability to replace them fast enough).

If they were able to keep their veteran pilots and seamen, I am fairly certain the US navy would have a tough time to match the IJN (Zero was far more superior than Hellcat for A-to-A battle). Also, without many of the atolls along the pacific, the US wouldnt have their forward bases and hence their superfortress would be useless.

flameo

Member
202

Mar 25th 2013, 6:23:45

nnnn

flameo

Member
202

Mar 18th 2013, 10:20:06

fdfd

flameo

Member
202

Mar 11th 2013, 13:17:41

dfdfd

flameo

Member
202

Mar 4th 2013, 6:34:20

dfdfdffdfdf

flameo

Member
202

Feb 25th 2013, 21:14:58

dfdf

flameo

Member
202

Feb 18th 2013, 10:08:57

asdfasdf

flameo

Member
202

Feb 11th 2013, 6:48:56

ddfd

flameo

Member
202

Feb 4th 2013, 12:29:22

dfdfd

flameo

Member
202

Feb 1st 2013, 1:01:36

I am assuming US east server?

flameo

Member
202

Jan 28th 2013, 3:15:51

dont need change the rules, just kill all potential untagged sucidiers.

flameo

Member
202

Jan 25th 2013, 11:35:58

A single country, untagged or in an alliance can pull a sting like this. In response, for an alliance case, this will escalate into a war. Same goes with the untagged right? since we cant pinpoint individual person within the the untagged, we just kill each one of them that we deemed a nuisance or a threat. So your argument stating that "an alliance can do this but an untagged cant" is invalid.

banning a suicider is equivalent to giving red card to a soccer player or sin-binning a footy player or whatever the equivalent is to American sports. Why not doing it?

flameo

Member
202

Jan 23rd 2013, 23:35:13

If you are running solo in an alliance server, you are either a) someone else landfarm or b) a suicider. You got no chance of hitting a good finish flying solo in alliance server, better should just plan in the primary server.

flameo

Member
202

Jan 21st 2013, 23:47:57

Kill this set and all the subsequent sets. Non-farmed untagged warrants a kill, enough say.

flameo

Member
202

Jan 20th 2013, 21:17:52

I guess we'll do the community service next set, any untagged in top 100 = kill

flameo

Member
202

Jan 14th 2013, 20:28:05

fdfdf

flameo

Member
202

Jan 7th 2013, 1:15:11

dfdfd

flameo

Member
202

Dec 31st 2012, 1:09:52

fdfdf

flameo

Member
202

Dec 24th 2012, 3:57:45

sdsd

flameo

Member
202

Dec 21st 2012, 1:59:04

what a pathetic alliance SoF is

flameo

Member
202

Dec 18th 2012, 0:47:28

fdfdf

flameo

Member
202

Dec 10th 2012, 22:51:24

cdcd

flameo

Member
202

Dec 3rd 2012, 20:41:59

rere

flameo

Member
202

Nov 26th 2012, 9:32:18

hdjdj

flameo

Member
202

Nov 19th 2012, 1:17:55

ere

flameo

Member
202

Nov 13th 2012, 6:03:23

rere

flameo

Member
202

Nov 6th 2012, 1:30:35

flameo

Member
202

Nov 2nd 2012, 2:57:46

Originally posted by tellarion:

Originally posted by flameo:

How come 808 never hits those that are farming them, like countries in LaF or EVO, instead goes for for those that never hit 808.

I would like to say a big thanks to everyone who keeps dragging our name into this crap. Pretty sure I myself got raped by this guy a few times already, so that disproves THAT theory.

Evo doesn't do crap like this, and I would love people to bring evidence to my attention so I can ban any members that do.

At the time when I posted, the hits from you two were unretalled. I could post the news, but you guys can find it yourselves I guess. Now, 808 did hit everybody, unprovoked, except those who are in war, RD and LaF. Particularly interesting that the excessive hits from LaF went unretalled, while there were countries in LaF that he could AB the sh!t out of it.

flameo

Member
202

Oct 31st 2012, 0:40:02

How come 808 never hits those that are farming them, like countries in LaF or EVO, instead goes for for those that never hit 808.

flameo

Member
202

Oct 29th 2012, 23:26:59

dfdfd

flameo

Member
202

Oct 22nd 2012, 1:54:29

sdfd

flameo

Member
202

Oct 16th 2012, 3:32:43

fdfd

flameo

Member
202

Oct 9th 2012, 1:08:05

rere

flameo

Member
202

Oct 1st 2012, 2:58:01

dfd

flameo

Member
202

Sep 24th 2012, 11:26:05

flameo

Member
202

Sep 18th 2012, 11:06:58

fer

flameo

Member
202

Sep 11th 2012, 5:01:54

Originally posted by nimrodix:

we did tell u the reason
we
hate
you

how freggin hard is it to understand that

why not say it straight away on your war dec, instead of wasting your time writing several paragraphs of lies to make it looks like LCN has a moral ground for their actions?

flameo

Member
202

Sep 11th 2012, 4:59:06

Originally posted by trumper:

http://www.eestats.com

ResDogs 119 PDM 128

Do you want me to paste news for you too? It's not like you guys hid this in the past. Now it's less formalized.

All attacks were either landgrab or retal performed by either KD, in no (not less) organization or formal arrangement, in accordance to the appropriate retal policy, with no fluff-move used, like suiciding or trying to outrun retals. Unless you considered two clans hitting and retalling as landtrading.

Again your accusation of it being less formalized is groundless, other than YOU seeing it as one.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 11th 2012, 1:09:01

Trumper saying landtrading somewhere in this thread, no he is quiet all of the sudden about this issue. Another groundless blame by LCN member.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 11th 2012, 1:06:18

Originally posted by locket:

Originally posted by Ruthie:

Its funny that everyone blames LCN for planning this over the past month when actually the membership wanted that after reading logs of all the crap going on the past week or so

your arrogance is your downfall

Considering every single shred of argument that seems based on facts has it appearing as if you guys are being complete tools I would have to say your comment is stupid. My question in this thread was ignored and all I have seen is comments about them having their own retal policy and a couple of comments about Trife which they instantly countered with a counter argument. Perhaps you should post something informative.

Its pretty obvious that LCN got no ground to FS PDM. Their claim on the dispute over retal policy was clearly a mere statement to cover up their action trying to force a clan to agree with whatever they want just because they can.

As for Trife quitting because PDM "pushing him to the limit", LCN causes all the FA headache with the suicider while the other FA dealing was approved by Purposeful1, the guy who said that Trife quit the game because of it.

And now what they can do is just avoid avoid and avoid the fact and keep making up posts after posts to cover it up.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 10th 2012, 13:28:20

Its pretty simple, you hit a clan then you comply with that clan retal policy, otherwise there is no point of having an individual retal policy. On the opposite, PDM accepts other people retal policy or if things need to be discussed, then FA would go and do it.

Also, what landtrading are you referring to Trumper? I have not seen any this set. All I see all over the news was grabbed made to and by different clans. Might have missed it but all over the news, it looks like hits made to different clans.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 10th 2012, 13:18:12

lol looks like LCN's FAs werent as transparent to their members, either feeding them false information or their members are a bunch of morons who just follow what's being told by your puppet master.

It is a surprise how you deal with suicidier, even the biggest assholes in the server dont deal with their suiciders by not taking responsibility of it and followed it by a war declaration.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 10th 2012, 13:14:07

Originally posted by trumper:

Originally posted by Rockman:

So LCN suicides PDM, and then FSs them because PDM was being annoying by asking for reps?

A bigger tag FSing a smaller tag that's trying to netgain cannot be good for the game. It's not like PDM was trying to be bullies, or even had a past history of being a bully.

This is where I get lost. If PDM is trying to netgain, why does everyone else have to comply to their retal window? The reality is that we were actually playing nice. One player who RoR earlier in the set, not only gave up the land, but continued FAing the PDMer every day his max amount, far in exceed of anything loss. And, we helped kill the suiciding country. Far from an alliance trying to pick a fight. But losing Trife, well, that is a last straw for us.

So by your book (I am assuming you are one of LCN members?), to deal with a suicider, a clan just need to help with killing the offending country and not being held liable for any damages (of close to 15k land lost)? If that's the case, any clan will be more than happy to comply with your policy.

And with the RoR, unless PDM did push it beyond what is being specified within PDM's retal policy, then it is still their right to use their policy to deal with any attacks coming towards their direction, otherwise there's no point of having a specific policy for each clan.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 10th 2012, 6:47:14

Originally posted by Purposeful1:

More seriously, though, we left lots of alliances open this set, and when it came down to it, nearly all of the actual conflicts centered around PDM. We were able to resolve most of them at the FA level (and actually, we continued to pay reps on one of them all the way up till the FS--and we'll finish up the reps on that particular incident once this war is over), but the overall frustration eventually hit a boiling point, both among general membership and some of our leaders. That's why PDM.

AFAIK, PDM did not instigate any of those conflicts. The only issue that had not been resolved prior to the FS was involving the suicider. Your reasoning only tells
A. we will suicide on you and
B. fluff reps, we will FS you.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 10th 2012, 6:10:06

Originally posted by Rockman:

There is no point pointing out the truth, they will ignore it instead of addressing it

flameo

Member
202

Sep 10th 2012, 2:25:23

So you had a suicider that hit PDM, your FA quit because of the FA madness surrounding this, then FS PDM? what a classy reason to FS someone.

flameo

Member
202

Sep 3rd 2012, 1:56:45

hhh

dfdf