Verified:

Pang Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5731

May 20th 2015, 17:45:51

-=Pang=-
Earth Empires Staff
pangaea [at] earthempires [dot] com

Boxcar - Earth Empires Clan & Alliance Hosting
http://www.boxcarhosting.com

mFrost Game profile

Member
325

May 21st 2015, 2:27:58

Originally posted by qzjul:
Originally posted by mFrost:
The correct answer would have been to open up the various programs offered by Federal and State govs to be purchased by corporations and individuals. Medicare is supposedly going to be run out of money in 20 or so years, and I would think the gov would love to get extra cash coming into its coffers. What would the difference be, whether i paid Medicare or Blue Cross, Tri-Care or Blue Cross, CHIP or Blue Cross? As long as at the end of the day bottom line i get the healthcare I need. Someone wants to support the military, they buy tri-care, someone wants to ensure medicare will still be available when they retire buys medicare, or someoneis thinking of the poor children they buy CHIPs. The extra money in those programs would allow them to reach out and help more people or provide even better coverage for those in need. Putting your money where your mouth is, you care about poor people, then invest your dollars where it would do the most good, big health insurance Companies is not it when it comes to helping poor people get what they need.

The other aspect to this solution is that it does create a cap insurance companies can charge, and/or they would need to differentiate themselves and offer a superior service people would be willing to pay extra for. Kind of like Fedex, UPS, vs. the US Post Office, they can charge a little more and still have the capacity to compete, however very few people are going to pay 3x the price for a similar service.


This is definitely the way to go for America; but, correct me if I'm wrong, this was part of the original version wasn't it? that got hacked to pieces to satisfy the Republican party? no?


as nice as it may be to say it was hacked to pieces because of republicans, the unfortunate fact is that it passed both the house and senate by the sheer force of a democratic only majority. This in essence points to the democrats not only had the capacity to pass whatever the hell they wanted to pass thru congress but also used this power to do so. Therefore in my book they do need to take complete ownership of what it is they passed, if they wanted the provisions above they should have included them, especially if it was to be a unilateral vote. there was nothing stopping them from including and they proved as much. You would think that a bill of this magnitude with the historical significance it would carry, would have been crafted for optimum success. Considering the way they passed this bill; why would they not stack in the pieces that would have truly ensured its success, and remove those portions which were clearly detrimental to its overall success?

mFrost