Search For Author: Wharfed - Earth Empires Forum

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 28th 2011, 20:53:57

I'd believe it. :P

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 28th 2011, 20:36:34

:D Yeah, Axa is pretty dense. Also quite inactive. I'm pretty sure I'm the most active of anyone in Sanctuary and I don't expect that to change, even with all the business I have to do IRL.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 28th 2011, 20:33:36

I have the same problem from multiple computers as well, so I guess it may very well be top100arena problem.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 28th 2011, 16:56:51

I have the same issue.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 25th 2011, 16:15:22

You will be more likely to get a hold of me than Axa or FP right now. That is all. I read my PMs here often enough, so I hope that's good enough.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 24th 2011, 1:04:13

lol

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 14th 2011, 18:23:08

nope

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Dec 6th 2011, 3:41:00

I still don't understand why the Islanders and Rangers are still in the same conference/division. Makes no sense.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

MD 46
LCN 48
Evo 44
Omega 43
SoF 37
Monsters 26
Sanct 19
fluff 16
m0m0 14
WoF 12
ICN 10
Rival 9
RAGE 5
NA 5
TIE 4
RoCk 3
Elysium 1
Rigor Mortis 1
CIA 0
KSF -3
HAN -5
PDM -5
LaF -21
RD -32
iMag -49
SoL -88
Elitez -144

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 4th 2011, 22:10:18

Wanted? That's a possibility, but not in the middle of a netting set.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 2nd 2011, 20:40:25

Seeing as it is broad, it can mean either. Therefore your argument isn't entirely valid.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 2nd 2011, 19:57:27

Who said that was for other dudes? Maybe it is only pertaining to untagged countries that tagged Sanct after being grabbed.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 2nd 2011, 19:50:58

Im not as old as some of you.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 2nd 2011, 19:44:08

This is alliance, not FFA.

Although, I'd be more inclined to believe a top feed is not 25% more land, but more like 35-40% more land.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 2nd 2011, 19:31:44

I've never seen someone lobby to build a bridge, only to not build a bridge.

What fluffing retards. How stupid do you have to be?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Nov 2nd 2011, 19:16:18

You can't dictate how someone else retals you. You are not a dictator and do not have tyannical control over the entire server.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Oct 28th 2011, 18:28:33

why is oil so cheap?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Oct 20th 2011, 15:48:13

potatoes > all

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Oct 14th 2011, 6:17:12

good luck doods!

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Oct 9th 2011, 17:36:46

Im eating grape juice.

What are you eating?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Sep 28th 2011, 3:33:15

How do you plan on winning if you can't hit their biggest countries?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Aug 19th 2011, 23:55:26

Alarm a llama!

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Aug 12th 2011, 18:37:58

evo vs sol - EVO
laf vs pdm - LAF
sof vs md - SoF
lcn vs sanct - Sanct
monsters vs na - Monsters
omega vs imag - omega
2025 vs rival - what?
tie vs rage - Rage
fbi vs rd - RD
icn vs ksf - ICN
trash vs citadel - huh?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jul 26th 2011, 18:31:25

yup

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jul 16th 2011, 0:25:28

lol, afaik, Galleri isn't in NBK any more. And last I checked NBK was FFA.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jul 15th 2011, 23:47:17

My name is Wharfed and I approve this message.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jul 9th 2011, 22:42:40

My casher is making $70m/turn, not buying bushels. 100% resource decay FTW!

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jul 9th 2011, 3:30:41

I like potatoes too.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jun 30th 2011, 6:12:08

LCN 54
SoF 36
Omega 35
Sanct 33
Evo 36
Monsters 24
MD 17
fluff 15
WoF 14
ICN 13
m0m0 11
KSF 2
RAGE 4
Rival 1
TIE 4
CIA 0
HAN -1
NA -4
PDM -9
RD -22
LaF -18
iMag -43
SoL -77

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jun 20th 2011, 21:08:37

Quick war against people who obviously were not war prepped in any way. Its easy to kill an entire clan that only has 300k troops max on all its countries.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jun 19th 2011, 17:34:51

Originally posted by Popcom:

dont recall. but if there was no salt QQ, u win 100 internets :)

also, semperfi has a lot of tyr and dicts for a netting clan no?

Tyr techers for grabbing? That's a good war strat.

We were definitely netting. There was no running Tyr's and Dicts because we were going to war someone.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jun 17th 2011, 2:57:55

LCN 51
SoF 34
Omega 35
Sanct 30
Evo 28
Monsters 26
fluff 17
WoF 14
ICN 13
m0m0 11
MD 10
KSF 2
RAGE 3
Rival 0
TIE 1
CIA 0
NA -3
PDM -7
RD -20
LaF -22
iMag -38
SoL -74
HAN -99

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jun 10th 2011, 16:42:14

lol...

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Jun 3rd 2011, 18:19:52

175m for top 10 cutoff

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

May 28th 2011, 19:17:09

you have time to resell?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

May 16th 2011, 20:27:03

Its like comparing the Persian Empire to the Roman Empire. Different times, different situations, different lots of things.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

May 14th 2011, 23:44:24

iMag -29
SoF 25
LCN 47
LaF -20
Evo 23
Omega 27
RD -20
Sanct 14
ICN 17
PDM -17
Monsters 21
fluff 10
WoF 13
NA 2
SoL -68
m0m0 12
CIA 0

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

May 8th 2011, 17:56:31

If they hit you back 3 or 4 times >48 hours after you hit them.... don't you think you should be able to hit them back? without the worry of being suicided?

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

May 8th 2011, 17:18:10

So, currently, the GDI in Express allows for people with GDI to make single attacks without having to worry about being suicided. However, it doesn't mean the opposing party can't over retal(3 or 4 LGs). Any sane person would then retal back, but then this allows the first person hit to suicide.

Think we could change GDI so that when ever 2 or more retals are made on a single attack, it sets the score back to 0? Basically allows the original agressor the chance to regain his land without having to worry about being suicided.

That or change it so you can hit someone only once ever 48 or 72 hours.

Edited By: Wharfed on May 8th 2011, 17:31:38
See Original Post

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

May 7th 2011, 19:25:56

yup

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 30th 2011, 1:53:00

Yeah, not everyone is capable of speed hitting, and sometimes, its the only way to kill someone.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 29th 2011, 6:05:34

Does anyone have any information of the rate at which your PCI changes? The Formula on the Wiki is obivously a MAX PCI, but there is nothing in relation to how it changes when the MAX PCI is not the same as the current PCI.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 29th 2011, 3:46:08

111:100 is the average of what I have gotten through large amounts of iterations based on an optimized CS count, defined amount of land not built as ent or res, and total land.

It never goes more than .5 in either direction.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 24th 2011, 20:32:55

imag -22
sof 23
lcn 37
laf -22
evo 17
omega 26
rd -19
sanct 8
icn 14
pdm -19
monsters 18
fluff 10
wof 12
na 5
sol -63
m0m0 9
cia 3

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 17th 2011, 22:03:26

If Demo's can sell at only $35/bushel and regular countries at $32/bushel with max tech, then what is the point of selling bushels on the public market to destock? There is none, because it only becomes worthwhile to sell on the public market at $35/bushel.

a $34 sale on public nets you $31.96, less than $32. So... please let Demo's sell for $36.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 17th 2011, 21:51:25

maybe bad players should stop being cry babies. I think that would solve the problem.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 17th 2011, 21:49:39

imag -18
sof 19
lcn 31
laf -21
evo 16
omega 25
rd -17
sanct 10
icn 13
pdm -21
monsters 17
fluff 11
wof 12
na 4
sol -54
m0m0 7
cia 2

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 17th 2011, 21:32:15

There is no competitive aspect to alliance any more.

Buy playing a country that land grabs for land, sure you run the risk of getting retalled, so you make your grabs count to make sure you always come out on top. If you play a country that explores, you run a greater risk of getting grabbed, so just get some Defense and stop being a care bear.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.

Wharfed

Member
384

Apr 15th 2011, 23:08:43

retal policies that have top feeds in them are absolutely retarded.

Just sayin.

>Wharfed

ABOYNE (vb.) To beat an expert at a game of skill by playing so appallingly bad that none of his clever tactics or strategies are of any use to him.