It's all good prime. It's more of an existential question about the game than an actual accusation.

It's an extension of the solo server "what is collusion" debate. Some folks are allowed to game the rules, others aren't. For that reason I push for total transparency, or for a lifting of all rules until fairness prevails.

I believe wholeheartedly that if maj1 and ratski lived 1000 miles apart and were friendly with the server mod, there's a solid chance they get deleted half as much. Even less so if they collude on the markets instead of with their hits.

Since I play on the side of the "bad guys who don't get their way," it's interesting to see the reaction when exploiting a bug in a failed changeset benefits the good guys. And see if they won't be a hypocrite in sermonizing even play when someone asks about a bug they're exploiting.